Westmoreland County Democratic judicial candidates outspend Republican opponents | TribLIVE.com

Westmoreland County Democratic judicial candidates outspend Republican opponents

Rich Cholodofsky
Kyle Baxter
Wayne McGrew
Jessica Rafferty
Matt Schimizzi
Mike Stewart II
Justin Walsh

The six candidates seeking two judicial vacancies on the Westmoreland County Court of Common Pleas combined to spend more than a half-million dollars during this spring’s campaign season, most of which came from their own family accounts.

According to campaign finance reports filed in Harrisburg, three Democratic candidates, attorneys Michael Stewart II, Jessica Rafferty and Matthew Schimizzi outspent their Republican opponents, public defender Wayne McGrew, state Rep. Justin Walsh and private attorney Kyle Baxter.

Rafferty topped all candidates with more than $201,00 in expenses that were listed through May 6. So far, her campaign has been funded through two $100,000 loans from her father.

Stewart’s campaign lists $175,000 from loans he and other family members provided. His campaign spent more than $152,000 through last week.

Schimizzi ’s campaign spent $118,000 and reported donations from himself and family members, totaling more than $85,000.

Baxter received a handful of donations that included contributions of nearly $65,000 from herself and other relatives. Her campaign spent nearly $52,000 to date.

Walsh, who was elected last year to his second term as a state representative, transferred $37,000 from his legislative campaign fund for his run for judge. He listed a total of $59,700 in revenues for the judicial campaign and spent more than $41,000 during the filing period.

McGrew reported spending about $5,000. He loaned his campaign $10,000, which accounted for most of the money available to spend on the race.

All six judicial candidates are running in both the Democratic and Republican primaries.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.