Westmoreland County to award $1M paving contract despite appeal over union requirement | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Westmoreland County to award $1M paving contract despite appeal over union requirement

Rich Cholodofsky
1448928_web1_GTR-RainClouds1-051519

Westmoreland County’s Democratic commissioners said Tuesday they intend to award a $1 million contract to pave local roads as a potential legal challenge looms against a policy that critics contend prohibits non-union companies from securing government work.

A lawyer for Tresco Paving Corp. of Plum, in a letter to commissioners last week, appealed the county’s decision to reject a bid the company submitted in early July. The appeal, according to Tresco attorney George C. Miller Jr., is based on a ruling issued this year by the state’s Commonwealth Court that invalidated a contract awarded by PennDOT. The court found in favor of two contractors who sued the state agency claiming it was prevented from securing a job because of PennDOT’s project labor agreement that barred non-union shops from seeking the contract.

“Stated broadly, TPC’s bid protest takes issue with the requirement that successful bidders comply with (a project labor agreement) … because that document, as written, acts as a means to emasculate the benefits of competitive bidding …,” Miller wrote.

The company asked county commissioners to reject all bids submitted for the paving work and reissue the request for proposals without requiring successful bidders sign a project labor agreement.

Commissioners Gina Cerilli and Ted Kopas in 2016 signed an agreement with the Pittsburgh Regional Building and Construction Trades Council that calls for higher work standards and prohibits work stoppages. The agreement mandates contractors hired by the county for projects in excess of $150,000 to meet a set of requirements and standards for its workers and includes a provision that companies have apprenticeship programs.

Commissioner Charles Anderson, a Republican, voted against the agreement. On Tuesday, he said it bars non-union firms from seeking county work.

“It’s an opportunity to repeal it and reassess where we are. We’ve been losing money on the project labor agreement for the last three years,” Anderson said of Tresco’s appeal.

Cerilli and Kopas said the paving contract would be awarded Thursday.

“We looked it over, but every situation is different,” Cerilli said of the court ruling. She declined further comment citing a potential legal challenge of the project labor agreement.

The county received five bids for the paving work, and officials recommended the $1 million bid from Derry Construction Co. Inc. be accepted. Tresco’s bid was rejected, commissioners said, because it did not include a signed project labor agreement. The value of Tresco’s bid was not publicly disclosed.

Vince Tresco Jr., company vice president, said Tuesday his company’s bid was lower but declined to provide a specific dollar amount.

“This is the 10th bid they’ve rejected over the last three years. They could have saved over $250,000,” Tresco said. “We’re not anti-union, but I legally cannot sign a (project labor) agreement.” Tresco claims the agreement violates state labor laws.

Tresco, who has long been a critic of the county’s project labor agreement, would not say if he intends to file a lawsuit seeking to have it invalidated.

The project labor agreement has been a partisan issue in Westmoreland County for more than a decade. A Democratic majority of the board of commissioners first instituted a project labor agreement in the 2000s, but it was rescinded in 2012 by an Anderson-led GOP majority.

Kopas defended the county’s project labor agreement Tuesday, saying it assures quality work. He said Tresco’s bid was opened and denied the claim it offered the cheapest price for the work.

“It appeared to be higher than the bid we are awarding,” Kopas said.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.