Westmoreland judge rejects Hyde Park man’s appeal of sexual assault conviction | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Westmoreland judge rejects Hyde Park man’s appeal of sexual assault conviction

Rich Cholodofsky
1969176_web1_GavelNewN

A Westmoreland County judge ruled the evidence presented against a Hyde Park man at his June sexual assault trial was sufficient to support the guilty verdicts rendered by jurors.

In a 16-page opinion issued Wednesday, Judge Meagan Bilik-DeFazio rejected the appeal by Larry Lee Redmond.

Redmond, 40, was convicted of the sexual assault and related offenses in connection with allegations raised by a 13-year-old girl in 2015. Redmond is currently serving an 8-to-20-year prison sentence.

In an appeal filed last month, Redmond contended his jurors had insufficient evidence to support the guilty verdict and that he should receive a new trial because of newly discovered evidence that could convince jurors of his innocence.

According to court records, Redmond’s defense suggested that following the trial it learned about a video conference between the victim and a relative in which she is alleged to have lied about her accusation that Redmond two times forced her to engage in sexual activity.

Redmond’s lawyer in court documents contended he could not produce the video and an attempt to question witnesses in court about that communication was rejected by judge.

Bilik-DeFazio said it was unlikely that evidence of the video communication would have resulted in a different verdict, which she said was based on the credibility of Redmond’s accuser.

“Defendant’s motion solely rested on an allegation that a video chat took place in which the minor victim stated that she had lied. This court opined that a further hearing on this was not necessary since it heard argument from both parties on the same issue during defendant’s sentencing,” the judge wrote.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.