Westmoreland municipalities count on windfall from natural gas impact fee | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Westmoreland municipalities count on windfall from natural gas impact fee

Stephen Huba
1365311_web1_trib-6voabr6alwkdpg0559e_layout
Tribune-Review file
A drilling rig looms over Western Pennsylvania landscape.

For communities across Westmoreland County, Act 13 is the gift that keeps on giving.

“I don’t know where we’d be without it,” Sewickley Township Supervisor Brian Merdian said.

Of the 65 municipalities in Westmoreland County, Sewickley enjoyed the biggest increase in natural gas impact fee windfall this year — from $148,352 in 2018 to $256,013 in 2019.

“When I saw that, I was shocked. I thought, ‘What a blessing,’ ” Merdian said.

He attributes the increase to a growth in the number of wells in the township and the addition of the Tenaska Westmoreland Generating Station, a natural gas-fueled power plant in neighboring South Huntingdon.

“The Tenaska plant needs the gas to power it, and we happen to have a good amount under Sewickley Township and drillers know that. We’re very amicable to them, and in return they follow our rules and ordinances. It’s a win-win situation,” he said.

The impact fee is the annual charge the state applies to each new unconventional well drilled into the Marcellus shale. Some of the money is distributed directly to counties to offset the costs of increased drilling activity. Some is made available to individual communities through grants.

Recently, the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission announced that the impact fee generated record revenue in 2018 — $251.8 million collected from natural gas producers by April 1.

Per Act 13’s provisions, $18.3 million will be taken “off the top” and given to state oversight agencies, $134.7 million will be distributed to counties and municipalities directly affected by drilling and $89.8 million will be transferred to the Marcellus Legacy Fund.

The legacy fund provides financial support for environmental, highway, water and sewer, rehabilitation of greenways and other projects throughout the state. It is distributed to all counties, regardless of the presence of wells within their borders.

Also this year, $8.8 million more is being distributed to municipalities and counties where producer payments had been withheld during a long-running court case concerning the definition of a “stripper well,” PUC said.


Broad uses

This year, Westmoreland County will receive $1.5 million in impact fee revenue, and municipalities within the county will receive more than $2 million for a total of $3.6 million, according to the Marcellus Shale Coalition.

County commissioners keep the Act 13 money separate from the general fund and allocate it in three ways —ß discretionary (Westmoreland 911, Westmoreland Conservation District), an account restricted for roads and bridges, and an account restricted for open spaces (farmland preservation, conservation district).

“The impact fee was written purposely broad to allow counties some flexibility in how they use those proceeds,” Commissioner Ted Kopas said. “The fact that it is purposely broad has allowed us to fund not just specific projects but some general county-related business that has helped offset reliance on county property tax dollars.”

That broadness came under criticism by state Auditor General Eugene DePasquale in a 2016 report accusing some communities of misusing impact fee money. DePasquale called for reforms to Act 13 that would correct the “lack of clarity” in the law on how the money can be spent. None of the communities audited was in Westmoreland County.

Act 13 stipulates that impact fee money can be spent on, among other things, construction, reconstruction, maintenance and repair of roadways, bridges and public infrastructure; water, stormwater and sewer systems; emergency preparedness and public safety; environmental programs, including parks and recreation; tax reductions; judicial services; and “the delivery of social services.”

Finding local purposes

Sewickley Township, among the top four receivers of revenue in the county in 2018 and 2019, keeps its Act 13 money separate from the general fund and uses it primarily for road projects and road equipment, Merdian said.

“I’m confident to think that public works would be the majority, if not the sole, beneficiary of this revenue,” Merdian said. “These monies have really been our lifeline and have kept us afloat.”

Derry Township, while keeping some of the Act 13 money in reserve for emergencies, has two projects in mind for this year’s windfall of $299,229 — the Raymond Avenue culvert replacement and two retention ponds, Supervisor David Slifka said.

Both projects are aimed at reducing flooding caused by stormwater runoff in an area of the township bordering the city of Latrobe.

“We look at our priorities every year, so it varies from year to year,” Slifka said. “We can use it for almost anything except wages.

Slifka said the Act 13 money is crucial because the grant funding the township received for the retention ponds won’t be enough to complete the project.

“With all the storms we’ve been having … infrastructure is what we’re really concerned with right now,” he said. “We’ve bought equipment in the past. If something breaks down, we know we have the luxury of that impact (fee) money. We’re fortunate that we have that buffer, that backup.”

For the second consecutive year, Derry Township is the largest impact fee beneficiary in the county, followed by Washington, Sewickley and South Huntingdon townships.

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.