Westmoreland Republicans nominate Kertes, Chew for commissioner | TribLIVE.com

Westmoreland Republicans nominate Kertes, Chew for commissioner

Rich Cholodofsky
Sean Kertes (left) and Douglas Chew

Biochemist Doug Chew and Sean Kertes, chief of staff to retiring Westmoreland County Commissioner Charles Anderson, were nominated Tuesday as the Republican candidates who will seek to reclaim the GOP majority at the courthouse.

Kertes and Chew finished atop the Republican primary for county commissioner, besting a field of seven candidates.

According to unofficial results, with all 305 precincts reporting, Kertes claimed 23.7% of the vote, while Chew received more than 22.5%. The top vote-getters were separated by about 500 votes and were easily ahead of third-place finisher John Ventre (13.5%). Paul Kosko was fourth (12.2%), followed by Heather Cordial (11.7%), Patricia Fritz (8.3%) and Ron Gazze (7%).

“I am humbled and honored to have the opportunity to be selected as one of the Republican candidates for county commissioner. I look forward to leading the ticket to victory in the fall,” Kertes said.

Chew said he’s open to teaming with Kertes.

“I’m excited about tonight’s results and excited about the future of Westmoreland County,” Chew said. “I look forward to meeting with Sean to talk about what we need to do to win in November.”

Chew had been critical of Kertes during the primary campaign and at one point suggested the two would be incapable of teaming up in the fall to run against incumbent Democrats Gina Cerilli and Ted Kopas, who were unopposed in Tuesday’s primary.

Early in the campaign, Chew blasted Kertes for taking campaign contributions from county vendors and suggested that as Anderson’s top staffer, he worked too closely with Democrats.

“I’m hoping Sean and I can put this primary behind us and move forward together. We have to work as a team and now we’re the two chosen that’s the best way to win in November.”

Chew, 48 of Hempfield, previously worked as a faculty member at the University of Pittsburgh and now serves as a self-employed grant writing consultant. He is making his first run for public office.

Kertes, 32, of Greensburg, is also making his first bid for an elective position. He has served as a member of Anderson’s staff since 2016, having previously worked as a deputy county treasurer.

Kertes positioned himself as the lone Republican on the ballot who had experience in county government and touted his work with Anderson while also attempting to distance himself from his boss on several key issues.

He did not dismiss teaming with Chew.

“I hope to talk to Doug Chew very soon and have GOP leadership to work out a game plan to move forward,” Kertes said.

Anderson endorsed Kertes as his replacement this spring but has yet to throw his support behind another candidate.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.