ShareThis Page
11 Fox Chapel Area musicians chosen for PMEA honors bands |
Fox Chapel

11 Fox Chapel Area musicians chosen for PMEA honors bands

Tawnya Panizzi
| Sunday, February 10, 2019 3:31 p.m
The Fox Chapel Area PMEA District 1 Band East.
Members of the Fox Chapel Area PMEA District 1 Honors Jazz Ensemble.

Eleven Fox Chapel Area High School students were chosen for two 2019 Pennsylvania Music Educators Association (PMEA) honors bands.

The PMEA District 1 honors jazz ensemble includes seniors Alexander Perez and Glenna Van Dyke and juniors Michael Mendelson and Jacob Rendall. They were selected by audition.

The ensemble each year comprises three 19-piece jazz bands with students from about 90 school districts that make up PMEA District 1.

Bands performed Feb. 2 at North Allegheny Senior High School under the direction of world-renowned jazz arrangers/composers Michael Kamuf and Ralph Ford.

The PMEA District 1 Band East included 10 district students who also were chosen by audition.

They are seniors Megan Hayes, Hannah Kim, Noah Manges, Alexander Perez and Glenna Van Dyke; juniors Jacob Rendall and Anzu Sekikawa; and sophomores Madelyn Francis, Nathaniel Kisslinger and Joey Wang.

The band had 120 of the best student-musicians from 35 high schools in Allegheny, Westmoreland and Fayette counties.

They performed Jan. 25 at Burrell High School. Guest conductor was Daniel Neuenschwander, director of bands at Kutztown University in Kutztown, Pa.

Tawnya Panizzi is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tawnya at 412-782-2121 x1512, or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.