ShareThis Page

Mt. Lebanon appeals ahead

| Wednesday, March 4, 2015, 9:00 p.m.

Mt. Lebanon will appeal 26 more residential property assessments in 2015, after reaching back as far as the late 1980s to find the most underassessed homes based on sale prices.

Meanwhile, an association representing Pittsburgh-area Realtors is using Mt. Lebanon as an example of how not to choose homes to reassess. It hopes to start pressuring the municipality for more transparency.

After accusations of a “newcomer's tax” filled commission chambers last year, with recent transplants shocked to find the municipality challenging their homes' taxable values while their longer-tenured neighbors went untouched, the commission and staff set out to develop new criteria to determine who was paying taxes on less than what their homes were worth.

“They wanted to cast a wider net, to find the most egregious properties,” said Finance Director Andrew McCreery.

McCreery said the commission and staff looked at Mt. Lebanon homes that sold for more than $200,000, then ran the resulting 2,600 properties' sales prices through a “housing price inflation index” to see what they would be in 2014 dollars.

They then compared the current assessments, which took effect in 2013 during the countywide reassessment process, to those inflation-adjusted sales prices.

The 41 residential properties whose assessments were less than half the adjusted sales price were sent to Diversified Municipal Services, whom the commission hired last week at a cost of $175 per appeal, to have them find comparable homes.

DMS winnowed the field to 26 by dropping properties if the difference between their prices and their comparable homes was less than $100,000, or if Mt. Lebanon appealed them in the previous two rounds. Those owners will be notified of the appeal by March 31, McCreery said.

Rather than targeting recent home sales, the new method picked out just five homes that were sold in 2014, he said. The rest were from prior to 2005 and went back as far as 1989, though the municipality had already filed about 450 appeals on homes that were assessed at 80 to 85 percent of what they sold for between 2006 and 2013.

Those appeals and the uproar they brought to commission meetings were why the Realtors Association of Metropolitan Pittsburgh chose Mt. Lebanon as the first focus of their “End the Newcomer Tax” campaign, said RAMP Executive Vice President John Petrack.

“They have the full, legal right to do so, but it isn't fair to new homebuyers,” Petrack said. “(People) move in, and six months to a year later, their taxes go up 25 to 50 percent.”

The Allegheny Institute for Public Policy this week published a report that found municipalities filed 1,483 assessment appeals in 2014, with Mt. Lebanon representing 287 — 19 percent — of those. The city of Pittsburgh filed all but one of the others, although school districts across Allegheny County filed an additional 2,860 appeals in 2014.

Petrack said the least that communities could do was to follow consistent, public criteria for determining which sales get appealed, so buyers could look at their potential home's assessment, look at what they are offering to pay and know whether they were candidates to get appealed, and budget accordingly.

Lenders might also want to know whether a property's monthly payments would be likely to jump and make their decisions on whether to grant a mortgage accordingly, he said.

“My issue all along has been the disclosure,” said Mike Suley of Mt. Lebanon, a reassessment consultant and the former manager of the Allegheny County Office of Property Assessments. “If you buy a car, wouldn't you rather know the sales tax at the point of sale, not a year later?”

So far, RAMP's website,, urges people to attend Mt. Lebanon's March 10 commission meeting and has contact information and an email form for the commissioners, but Petrack said he'd like eventually to expand the focus to other municipalities and school districts that target sales, including Pittsburgh.

Matthew Santoni is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5625 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me