ShareThis Page
Carlynton board approves 2019-20 proposed preliminary budget | TribLIVE.com
Carnegie/Bridgeville

Carlynton board approves 2019-20 proposed preliminary budget

Jim Spezialetti
| Friday, January 18, 2019 1:30 a.m
644839_web1_sig-carlyntonlogo-092718

Carlynton School Board members approved the 2019-20 proposed preliminary budget during their Jan. 15 meeting.

The $29.98 million preliminary budget was approved with the intent to request an OK from the Pennsylvania Department of Education to go above the index for a referendum exception up to the maximum permitted by law.

School officials made the same preliminary approval for the 2018-19 budget.

Without knowing state funding and other revenue sources, Carlynton directors used this past budget as a guide. Expenses are nearly $1.5 million more than 2018-19.

Christopher Juzwick, director of fiscal affairs and budget, said early budget numbers use $1.405 million of the fund balance. Juzwick said the district’s fund balance from the 2017-18 school year stands at $2.6 million.

School principals will be submitting their proposals to Juzwick in the coming weeks.

Juzwick said the goal is to use as little of the fund balance as possible to balance the budget.

Carlynton school board members will hold finance committee meetings the second Tuesday of every month.

Final approval for the 2019-20 budget must be made by the end of June.


Jim Spezialetti is a Tribune-Review contributor.


Categories: Neighborhoods | Carlynton
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.