ShareThis Page
Franklin Park rejects request to allow gas extraction from under recreation area |
North Hills

Franklin Park rejects request to allow gas extraction from under recreation area

Tony LaRussa
| Thursday, January 17, 2019 1:05 p.m
Franklin Park council voted against a request from an energy company to extract shale gas from under Linbrook Park on Wednesday, Jan. 16, 2019. The plan called for locating the well head about 3/4 mile outside the park in nearby Economy Borough.

After weeks of public debate over the potential benefits and possible risks of signing a lease to allow an energy company to extract Marcellus Shale gas from a mile below a Franklin Park recreation area, council rejected the proposal.

Nearly two dozen borough residents commented at Wednesday night’s council meeting before officials voted 4-2 against awarding PennEnergy Resources a five-year lease to extract shale gas from the park.

Councilmen James Hogg, James Lawrence, John Parks and Luke Myslinski voted against awarding the lease. Council members Thomas Schwartzmier and Laura Coombs voted in favor of entering into the agreement.

Many of the residents who spoke for or against the proposal reiterated comments made during a previous public meeting, including a special session held on Monday in which borough officials outlined the proposal.

More than 250 people, including residents and organized anti-fracking activists, packed into the Jan. 14 session at the Blueberry Hill Park activity center. A tally by the borough recorded 46 residents who were against allowing drilling and 11 residents in support. Only borough residents are permitted to speak at meetings.

The proposed agreement with PennEnergy called for an upfront payment to the borough of $283,500 plus an a 18-percent royalty on the value of any gas that is extracted in exchange for allowing gas to be extracted from below the 81-acre park.

PennEnergy already has agreements with 70 private property owners surrounding and near Linbrook Park to extract gas from underneath about 730 acres of their property.

The company plans to place the well head and surface drilling operations about 3/4 a mile away in Economy, Beaver County. To get the gas out of the ground, crews will bore down between 5,000 and 9,000 feet and then send 18 lateral lines out about 10,000 feet into the shale rock and use a process called hydraulic fracturing to send it to the well head.

The company says it has the technology to bypass the gas in Linbrook Park and extract it from the surrounding properties.

The lease — and Franklin Park regulations —prohibit any surface drilling operations in that area of the borough, which means no well pads, drilling equipment, storage or personnel will be permitted on the property.

Many of the comments from people against the proposed lease expressed a general contempt for fracking because they believe it is a risk to health and the environment. Some cited the possibility that allowing fracking in the park would create a negative image for the borough.

Supporters of the lease, though significantly fewer in number, noted that since gas is already going to be extracted from around the park, it makes no financial sense for the borough to simply skip getting its share of the revenue to pay for improvements and other expenses.

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tony at 724-772-6368 or or via Twitter @TonyLaRussaTrib.

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tony at 724-772-6368, or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.