ShareThis Page
P-R supervisors to vote on school start time adjustments |
North Hills

P-R supervisors to vote on school start time adjustments

Karen Price
| Saturday, January 19, 2019 1:30 a.m

The Pine-Richland school board is slated to vote on a measure approving a change in school start times at its Feb. 11 meeting.

The proposed start times, which would be effective for the 2019-20 school year, are 7:45 a.m. for the high school and middle schools, 8:35 a.m. for Eden Hall Upper Elementary and 9:20 a.m. for the primary schools.

District officials have been discussing the possibility of later start times to better serve the sleep requirements of teenagers for more than a year.

“We’ve made some modifications over that period of time based upon feedback and additional research over those months,” Assistant Superintendent Michael Pasquinelli said. “We’ve been working closely with School Transportation Associates looking to be as efficient as we can for our bus routes so from the beginning we’ve looked at the opportunity to have a positive impact for secondary students and, to the best of our ability, to minimize the impact for lower age students and we feel like we’ve done that through this latest proposal.”

The proposed change reflects a 25-minute later start time for the high school and middle school. Eden Hall students currently start at 8:30 a.m. and primary schools start at 9:15 a.m.

Supervisor Ben Campbell noted at the board’s Jan. 14 meeting that he would like to consider methods the district can put in place to allow low-cost early student drop-offs for younger students.

“A lot of parents brought up the fact that it’s very hard, even at the current start times, to get their kid on the bus and get off to work at a reasonable time,” Campbell said. “I’d like to see something like that looked at regardless of which way the vote goes.”

Karen Price is a
Tribune-Review contributor.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.