ShareThis Page
Plum man sentenced to more than 3 years in jail for robbing Mt. Washington bank | TribLIVE.com
Plum/Oakmont

Plum man sentenced to more than 3 years in jail for robbing Mt. Washington bank

Michael DiVittorio
| Monday, February 11, 2019 7:28 p.m
738543_web1_web-courts9

A Plum man was sentenced in federal court to three years and four months in jail for robbing a bank in the Mt. Washington section of Pittsburgh.

Senior U.S. District Court Judge David S. Cercone imposed the sentence on Matthew Gallo, 35, with imprisonment followed by three years of supervised release, federal authorities announced Monday.

Gallo was convicted of a charge of bank robbery. The charges stemmed from a Dec. 4, 2017, incident at the First National Bank in Mt. Washington.

Authorities said Gallo passed the teller a note and made off with about $730.

The FBI received two separate tips identifying Gallo as the robber.

He was arrested by Allegheny County Sheriff deputies on Jan. 10, 2018, on an unrelated matter, and later confessed to the robbery, authorities said.

Federal authorities said Gallo also identified himself as the robber in a surveillance photograph.

The FBI, Pittsburgh police and the Allegheny County Sheriff’s Office conducted the investigation through Project Safe Neighborhoods, which is part of the Department of Justice’s violent crime reduction efforts.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, mdivittorio@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

Categories: Neighborhoods | Plum
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.