ShareThis Page
Riverview High track damage remains, team to again compete away all season | TribLIVE.com
Plum/Oakmont

Riverview High track damage remains, team to again compete away all season

Michael DiVittorio
| Friday, February 8, 2019 10:00 a.m
704040_web1_riverside-park

Riverview High School track teams will have all away meets for a second — and possibly third — straight season as Oakmont and school district officials continue to debate who should pay for track repairs.

Meets were first rescheduled in March 2018, when it was determined the track in the lower section of the borough’s Riverside Park does not meet competition standards. The borough owns and maintains the park.

The track is damaged by tree roots that have pushed it up and made it uneven. There are several bumps in lane one and another in lane two. The team still practices on the track, which has not been closed to the community.

District Athletic Director Mario Rometo confirmed via email late last month that Riverview families will have to travel once again to see their children compete.

Track season starts in March with state competitions scheduled in late May.

“I have not heard any feedback from the families regarding the away meets,” Rometo said. “The student athletes are resilient and are looking forward to the upcoming season to once again compete for section championships.”

The borough bought the all-weather track from New York-based Nagle Athletic Surfaces about seven years ago.

Total estimated replacement cost for a new track is $75,000 to $100,000.

Riverview School Board member Alex DiClaudio said the district received a letter from the borough in January asking for a commitment to help pay for track repairs.

“The issue we’re running into is that the borough and the district are on different budget cycles,” he said.

Municipalities adopt their budgets in December. School districts approve their final spending plan for the following school year in June.

“We don’t have anything for the track budget in this (school year’s) budget,” DiClaudio said. “We can’t make any commitments in next year’s budget until we go through the process. There’s a lot of ground to cover between now and (June). We certainly want to be active members with the borough to come up with a solution.”

The district’s portion of track repairs could be $30,000 to $50,000.

DiClaudio said it could take until the 2020-21 school year budget talks before the district could make any firm financial commitments. Officials also hope to find grants to offset costs.

“It’s way too soon to know what we’re going to be able to do,” he said. “We have to put all of our educational priorities first. What we don’t want to do is say, ‘No. We’re not going to do anything,’ and the track doesn’t get repaired. It’s still being worked out.”

Council awarded a $22,780 tree removal contract to BeaverJack Tree Service in mid-October.

Nine trees were cut down and root barriers were installed at five of them.

“The decision to remove the trees was not an easy one,” Councilwoman Leah Powers said. “(It) was only agreed upon after consulting with a forester from the Pennsylvania Department of Natural Resources, a landscape architect from Environmental Planning and Design, and members of the Oakmont Shade Tree Commission.”

She said commission member Jonathan Dreher created a plan to plant 10 new trees. It’s unclear when that would occur.

Council last month authorized Pittsburgh-based Environmental Planning and Design to prepare bid documents for the track repair project.

Rometo said he’s hopeful the park will be ready for competition soon.

“I was very happy to hear of the approval to remove the trees and bid preparation,” he said. “I think things are moving in the right direction.”

Proposals are due at the borough office by Feb. 14, the same day bids will be opened.

The contract could be awarded at council’s 7 p.m. Feb. 18 voting meeting.

It is possible the track could be closed for a third season due to the lack of financial commitment from the district for repairs.


Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, mdivittorio@tribweb.com or via Twitter @MikeJdiVittorio.


Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, mdivittorio@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

Categories: Neighborhoods | Plum
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.