ShareThis Page
Ross Commissioner DeMarco reappointed to Northland Library board of directors | TribLIVE.com
North Hills

Ross Commissioner DeMarco reappointed to Northland Library board of directors

Tony LaRussa
| Wednesday, February 13, 2019 6:22 p.m
747251_web1_WEB-northland-library-sign
747251_web1_Dan-DeMarco

Ross Commissioner Dan DeMarco has been reappointed to a five-year term as the township’s representative on the board of the directors for Northland Public Library.

Commissioner voted unanimously on Feb. 11 to reappoint DeMarco, who represents the township’s 2nd Ward and is vice president of the board of commissioners. He has served on the library board since 2003 and was vice president in 2018.

“The board is one of the most valuable assets we have in the north hills,” DeMarco said. “It’s an honor to once again be appointed to the board.”

The library board, which is responsible for developing policies to govern the library’s operations, is comprised of elected officials from the five municipalities in the north hills that support Northland.

In addition to funding from participating municipalities, the library receives support from a the Northland Pubic Library Foundation.

The other members on the library are: Tom Kosmala of Bradford Woods, Karrie Lukin of Franklin Park, Joan Powers and Cynthia Potter of McCandless, Linda McFadden of Marshall and Casey Sample of Ross.

Vincentian Academy senior Christina Patterson serves as a junior member of the board.

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tony at 724-772-6368, tlarussa@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.