ShareThis Page
Water under the bridge | TribLIVE.com
Carnegie/Bridgeville

Water under the bridge

John F. Oyler
| Wednesday, February 6, 2019 1:30 a.m

I have been writing this column in one version or another since 1994 for a variety of long-suffering publishers. The version published in the newspaper these days is about 550 words long, satisfying the requirements of the printed newspaper.

To produce this version, I begin with a rough draft that typically is about 1,000 words long, then edit it meticulously to reach the desired length. In the summer of 2016, I decided to enter the 21st century and archive these longer versions on a blog.

As a result, I have been able to archive the long version of the most recent 122 columns at the website mywutb@blogspot.com. The Bridgeville Area Historical Society also began to archive them on their website at about the same time; you can find them under the pull-down menu, “Water Under the Bridge.”

In addition to publishing the edited versions weekly in the printed edition of the Signal-Item, Trib Total Media occasionally includes them on their digital page, “Trib-Live” in the “Local/Carnegie-Bridgeville” section. These columns are also archived; searching for “Oyler” turned up old columns as far back as 2015.

An added bonus to the “mywutb” blog site is the information on viewers of various columns. To date, there have been 4,230 page views, about five per day and 35 per column. The frequency of viewing, of course, continues to increase as more columns are added. The most views in one day was 52 on Jan. 5 this year. This January has also seen the most page views – 358.

The site also records the source of the viewers. Sixty-four percent of the views are folks in the United States – about 2,700. Then comes Germany and Poland at 6-percent apiece, followed by France, “Unknown Region,” Ukraine, Portugal, Russia, Spain and Netherlands. Today, for example, there were 13 views from India and 10 from Bangladesh. What suddenly generated interest in that part of the world?

The blog also records statistics for each column. The current all-time leader is a column I wrote in the spring of 2017 about the Pitt Civil Engineering Senior Design program. Its popularity comes from the fact that it is referenced on the department website.

Second is “The McLaughlin’s and Saw Mill Run Railroad” with 54 views. Since “The Pittsburgh and Castle Shannon Railroad” is the fifth most popular, with 30 views. I suspect that there is a small clique of rail-fans in the audience.

A column I wrote on the demise of the “Bridgeville Area News” newspaper came in third. Along with “The C. P. Mayer Brick Company” (4), “Catfish” (8), and “The Flannery Brothers” (10), it is an encouraging endorsement of our interest in local (Chartiers Valley) history.

Despite the thousands of page views, there has only been one comment posted on the blogsite. It was in response to a column on “Upper St. Clair History” that I wrote last summer. The author was a great-granddaughter of Joseph Lutz, looking for information on the Lutz family. A dialogue between her and the Historical Society has been initiated on this subject.

So far, my involvement with the blog has been very positive. It is an excellent place for me to store old columns and a great source of amusement following the statistics on viewership.


John F. Oyler is a contributing writer. You can reach him at 412-343-1652 or joyler@icloud.com. Read more from him at mywutb.blogspot.com.


Categories: Neighborhoods | Carlynton
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.