ShareThis Page

Time running out for Aspinwall residents' input on park

| Wednesday, May 2, 2012, 8:14 p.m.

With fundraising for the Aspinwall Riverfront Park project ongoing, organizers now want to hear from residents about how the park should look.

A survey is available online and at local municipal buildings that asks residents what features they would like to see at the park.

The deadline to complete the survey has been extended to May 7.

The survey asks how people would use the park and what features would be most important to them.

Susan Crookston, project coordinator, said organizers wanted to get an idea of what people want from the park.

"What we really want to get is a 30,000-foot view of what the community really needs," Crookston said.

After the results come in, the suggestions will be considered when designing the park.

"We want to design something people will use and love for many years," Crookston said.

Trish Klatt, head of the design committee, said people associated with the project want to make sure they do right by the community.

"We feel a responsibility," Klatt said. "We're stewards of the community's money and we need to know what their values are."

With numerous fundraisers and donations made by all ages, getting as much input as possible is important, she said.

"I feel like every single one of those people deserves to have their money spent in a way that is meaningful to them," Klatt said.

The opportunity to have a say in the development of a local park is one that should not be overlooked, Crookston said.

"It's really a unique thing for people to be able to actually participate in creating something that will potentially last for hundreds of years," Crookston said.

"If you think about the power of that, it's pretty exciting."

To take the survey online, see Paper surveys are available at local municipal buildings.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me