ShareThis Page

Interest strong in redeveloping former Long Run Children's Learning Center in White Oak

| Monday, Nov. 24, 2014, 4:21 a.m.
The real estate agent listing the old Long Run Children’s Learning Center in White Oak says it shouldn’t take long to find a buyer for the property, which hit the market last month with list price of $1.25 million.
Cindy Shegan Keeley | Trib Total Media
The real estate agent listing the old Long Run Children’s Learning Center in White Oak says it shouldn’t take long to find a buyer for the property, which hit the market last month with list price of $1.25 million.

The building that once housed Long Run Children's Learning Center in White Oak remains vacant and on the market, but the real estate agency listing the property is optimistic that it won't take long to find a buyer.

Peter Licastro of Point Bridge Realty Advisors LLC said the 17-year-old building on Long Run Road is well-maintained and would be a good fit for another educational facility or for retail, office or medical space.

The property went on the market in October and is listed for $1.25 million, a price Licastro says “is a very good deal relative what to what it would cost to replace a building like that.”

“We've had a number of inquiries and tours of the building already,” he said, adding that more prospective buyers are looking at the facility this week. “The interest has been very strong.”

Home to the learning center from 1998 until August, the building was designed for a preschool program serving regular and special-needs children.

The building is 11,540 square feet and is on a 2.25-acre lot. Licastro said it's attractive to a wide range of potential buyers because it is zoned for C-2 commercial use and is in a high-traffic area.

Two education-based groups have looked at the building. Licastro said other prospective buyers have included parties seeking investment property and groups interested in locating businesses in all or part of the building.

Long Run Children's Learning Center closed this summer due to financial issues. Center officials said the loss of funding over the years for special education programs was a factor. Less than 5 percent of the about 150 students enrolled last fall could be described as disabled.

The center was started in 1962 by Bertha Mae Chaplin with the goal of serving preschool children with special needs. The center later began admitting mainstream students and hosted a pre-K Counts program for McKeesport Area School District.

The center was having financial issues when InVision Human Services of Wexford acquired it in 2013. InVision assessed the program and determined it was not financially sustainable.

InVision's Marjie Foster said most of the furnishings, materials and equipment from the school has been sold or given away.

Foster said InVision would like to see the building restored to an educational use.

“Everybody was sad to see this facility close,” she said. “It's tailored for early childhood education.”

Realtor Robert Baum, whose agency is not involved in the marketing of the property, said there is interest in the old learning center.

“There are numerous possibilities for that building. It's too good to knock down,” Baum said. “It could be converted into doctors' offices or a professional building. It could probably even become retail.”

Eric Slagle is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1966, or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me