ShareThis Page

Baldwin residents campaign for return of bus route

| Wednesday, Sept. 3, 2014, 9:01 p.m.
Sissy Edelman of Brentwood (back left) and Mitzie Biertempfel of Baldwin Borough, look on while Cathy Szemanski of Baldwin Borough (front left) and Louise Weil of Baldwin Borough sign a petition to bring port authority buses back to Baldwin.
Randy Jarosz | For Trib Total Media
Sissy Edelman of Brentwood (back left) and Mitzie Biertempfel of Baldwin Borough, look on while Cathy Szemanski of Baldwin Borough (front left) and Louise Weil of Baldwin Borough sign a petition to bring port authority buses back to Baldwin.

Each winter, Terry Breisinger would board a Port Authority of Allegheny County bus with his four children and headed downtown Pittsburgh to see the holiday lights and buy their mother a Christmas present.

All of that changed in 2011, when the Port Authority eliminated the 50 Spencer bus route, which Breisinger, 50, could catch within 100 yards of his home, he said.

Now, Breisinger, a 24-year Baldwin Borough resident who is visually impaired, relies on friends or family to drive him to Brownsville Road in Brentwood or walks “down and up a hill” on streets without sidewalks. His wife now drives the family to purchase her Christmas gift each year.

“Port Authority is public transit. I am a customer of the public transit system,” Breisinger said. “Their services are provided to many other areas. When they cut the service in 2011, in my opinion, they made a mistake.”

A group of north Baldwin Borough residents are sharing their stories and rallying together along with the organization Pittsburghers for Public Transit in an effort to get their bus route back. They're holding town meetings that have drawn as many has 85 people, collecting signatures for a petition, meeting with Port Authority leaders and hosting a walk to show just how far they must walk to access public transit.

The “Walk a Mile in Our Shoes” walk will start at 10 a.m. Saturday at the Churchview Garden apartments, 3783 Churchview Avenue Extension and go to the Baldwin Borough municipal building, 3344 Churchview Avenue, with a rally at 11 a.m.

“As a grass-roots group, we believe that the most power comes from people working together,” said Molly Nichols, with Pittsburghers for Public Transit. “Just because you can't reinstate all the routes doesn't mean you can't reinstate some of them.”

The Port Authority once had more than 200 bus routes, spokesman Jim Ritchie said. Today, there are 102, with no plans to restore the cut routes, he said.

“The residents seeking additional transit service have been heard, and they clearly represent the high demand for public transportation that exists throughout his region. ... However, the funding does not allow for the restoration of the routes that have been cut in the last several years,” Ritchie said.

Pittsburghers for Public Transit began working with Baldwin residents because of the municipality's close proximity to the city yet “exceptional gap in service” between the north and southern ends of the borough, Nichols said.

Residents living in the Churchview Garden apartments must walk nearly two miles to Brownsville Road to catch the 51 Carrick, she said.

“It's hilly, and there are no sidewalks,” Nichols said.

More than 500 north Baldwin residents participated in a survey from Pittsburghers for Public Transit about their transportation needs, with 97 percent of the respondents indicating that public transit is important.

Karen Smith, 68, of Baldwin, has relied on public transportation.

Driving is too costly, with the price of parking downtown, Smith said, so she takes fewer trips to the city.

“I want to go. I'd love to meet my friends for lunch. I'd even love to go to the farmers market down there,” Smith said.

On Aug. 31, Port Authority made adjustments to several routes, including the 51 Carrick, which many north Baldwin residents now take in lieu of the 50 Spencer. The 51 Carrick travels more frequently.

Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5818 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me