ShareThis Page

Final, 3rd meeting to focus on closed Schenley High School

| Monday, July 23, 2012, 12:09 a.m.
The former Schenley High School in Oakland.
Andrew Russell | Trib Total Media
The former Schenley High School in Oakland.

People who live near the former Schenley High School are speaking up to guarantee that they'll have a say in its future.

The last of three community vision meetings concerning possible uses of the building, which closed at the end of the 2007-08 year, will be at 7 p.m. Wednesday at UCP/CLASS, 4638 Centre Ave. in Oakland.

“We would like to see something that maintains the integrity of the building and doesn't have a huge impact on the neighborhood around it,” said Wanda Wilson, executive director of the Oakland Planning and Development Corp., one of the meetings' sponsors along with the Bellefied Area Citizens Association and the Schenley Farms Civic Association.

About 50 residents attended each of the two previous meetings, Wilson added.

When Pittsburgh Public Schools put the building up for sale in 2011, the only bid was $2 million from PMC Property Group in Philadelphia. The school district still owes $3 million on the building, so the minimum bid is set at $4 million.

Pittsburgh City Councilman Bill Peduto, whose office is funding the meetings, said Pittsburgh Public Schools Superintendent Linda Lane had agreed to wait to put out another request for proposal until she had heard the community's findings.

“It's a public building, and the public should have a say in what the adaptive reuse is,” Peduto said. “It has shaped Oakland for 100 years.”

Peduto hopes to present the community's findings to Lane no later than the first week in August.

“This report will only have impact if it is well-received by the school board,” said Norm Cleary, president of the Schenley Farms Civic Association. “We're very hopeful that the board will see this as a tool that they can apply to their process of selling the school.”

Proposals include using the building for multiple purposes, such as having apartments on the upper floors and work spaces on the lower floors.

“Though the upper floors make really nice housing units, the lower floors don't,” said Rob Pfaffman, an architect who is consulting on the project. “So the lower floors might make a great kind of live-work facility for artists or entrepreneurs.”

Pfaffman estimated that renovations would cost about $40 million, depending on the project chosen by developers.

Dan Davis, an environmental engineer with Skelly & Loy, estimated that removing asbestos from pipes and walls would cost $4 million.

“The way the classrooms are made and the exterior looks beautiful, but when you get to the nuts and bolts of the building, you see the true cost,” Davis said.

Peduto added that he hopes the process involving neighborhoods, the district and the city is replicated with other vacant area schools.

“A school is an anchor, and a community is built around it,” Peduto said. “But an empty school can become an anchor that can weigh a community down.”

Adam Wagner is a news intern for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7956 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me