ShareThis Page
News

Fired WTAE anchor Wendy Bell returns to Facebook

| Saturday, April 2, 2016, 9:45 p.m.
Wendy Bell, former WTAE news anchor
WTAE
Wendy Bell, former WTAE news anchor

Wendy Bell returned to social media Saturday by setting up a new Facebook page four days after WTAE-TV fired her over a controversial March 21 post she made on her WTAE Facebook page.

“This page is for the city I love and the country I adore. I am a journalist. A mom of 5. A dreamer who believes we all have the power to make a difference,” Bell says on the page.

In its first three hours of existence, her page drew more than 20,600 likes.

Bell and a spokesman for WTAE's parent company, Hearst Television, couldn't be reached for comment.

Bell's speculation about the race, backgrounds and family histories of the gunmen who killed five adults and an unborn child last month at a Wilkinsburg cookout drew widespread criticism. The same post commented on the positive work of a South Side restaurant worker, who is black.

Bell, who is white, later apologized, as did WTAE. The post was removed, and her WTAE Facebook page has been deleted by the station.

WTAE officials on Wednesday said they fired the popular anchor because her Facebook post was “inconsistent with the company's ethics and journalistic standards.”

Brian Bowling is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-325-4301 or bbowling@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me