ShareThis Page

High-tech help hard to find for Uber in Pittsburgh

Aaron Aupperlee
| Thursday, April 14, 2016, 5:24 p.m.

One of the chief challenges at Uber's Advanced Technology Center in the Strip District, aside from perfecting self-driving cars, is finding people to work there.

John Bares, the center's director, joked at the start of a talk Thursday before members of the Pittsburgh Technology Council that Uber chose Pittsburgh as the site of the ride-share company's hub for autonomous vehicle innovation because of “super-advanced, modern infrastructure and the weather.”

The audience paused before laughing, knowing the joke underscored the challenges the city's tech growth faces in recruiting the industry's brightest minds.

“We're struggling and fighting to find the right people,” Bares said. “If you showed me 100 of the right people, we'd hire them tomorrow.”

A burgeoning start-up scene and investments from top technology companies such as Google in Bakery Square, Facebook and virtual reality pioneer Oculus in Oakland have bestowed the Steel City with new nicknames such as Silicon Valley East, the Silicon Strip and Silicon Alley. But recruiters say the city lacks what employees are seeking.

“We are aware that the concentration of high-tech jobs is increasing here,” said Vera Krekanova, chief strategy officer at Three Rivers Workforce Investment Board. “They could grow faster if they had access to talent at that level.”

Krekanova said Pittsburgh's universities are producing top talent, but the graduates are not staying. They leave, in part, because the Bay Area and elsewhere are more attractive, but also because many tech jobs around Pittsburgh require some experience — experience only available elsewhere.

John Yocca, president of A.C. Coy, a Peters Township-based tech recruiting firm, said he has had little success persuading software engineers to move from the West Coast to Pittsburgh. The limited number of computer science graduates from programs at Carnegie Mellon University and University of Pittsburgh are heavily recruited by outside companies and enticed to leave, said Yocca, a CMU computer science grad.

Bares, who headed CMU's National Robotics Engineering Center for more than a decade before founding Carnegie Robotics and ultimately joining Uber, said the Advanced Technology Center is constantly re-locating people from West Coast tech epicenters to work in Pittsburgh. A family from Mountain View, Calif., home of Google, was in town Thursday to see the city, and the Uber staff hoped to keep them, Bares said.

Uber announced the opening of its Advanced Technology Center last year. Near CMU's robotics center in Lawrenceville, the center hired away 40 researchers and scientists from the university months later. Uber plans to locate a testing operation in the Almono development on the former LTV Steel site in Hazelwood.

Bares would not say how many employees the Advanced Technology Center plans to hire. “A lot,” he said. The company's website has 64 positions posted.

He said recruits want more bike paths, cleaner air and better public transit. They want a vibrant downtown, and they want to live in it. Uber is competing for people looking at jobs in San Francisco, San Jose, San Diego, Seattle and Boulder.

“If any of you have anything to do with making Pittsburgh better for young people, keep on it and hard, because that's what we're competing against,” Bares said. “Every single person we're hiring, with almost no exception, we're picking off from somewhere.”

And every person Uber hires, Bares said, could get another job tomorrow if they wanted.

Aaron Aupperlee is a Tribune-Review staff writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me