ShareThis Page
News

Sen. Graham skips Cleveland, stumps for Toomey in Pittsburgh

| Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 11:21 p.m.
Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina shakes hands at an event for PA Sen. Pat Toomey at Roland's in the Strip Distritct Tuesday, July 19, 2016.
Jasmine Goldband | Tribune-Review
Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina shakes hands at an event for PA Sen. Pat Toomey at Roland's in the Strip Distritct Tuesday, July 19, 2016.

Asked why he skipped the Republican convention to stump in Pittsburgh for U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey, South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, a onetime GOP presidential hopeful, said Tuesday, “There's no use going to the convention if you can't support the nominee.”

Republicans in Cleveland formally nominated businessman Donald Trump as their candidate for president to face Democrat Hillary Clinton.

“People don't trust her for a variety of reasons,” he said. “So she's got her challenges. Our nominee has his challenges.” But unless members of the Senate and House do a better job of working together, “I don't think it really matters” who the next president is, he said.

Graham was in town with South Carolina's junior U.S. Sen. Tim Scott to campaign for Toomey, a Lehigh Valley Republican who is vying for his second term. The three spoke to more than 50 members of the Allegheny County Young Republicans at Roland's Seafood Grill in the Strip District.

Graham praised Toomey's ability to “reach across the aisle and do big things.”

Polls show Toomey holds a slight lead over Democratic challenger Katie McGinty.

“The linchpin to holding the Senate is Pat Toomey,” Scott told the audience. “Y'all — Southern for you all — will decide the fate of the Senate.”

Graham was one of 17 Republicans who sought the nomination, but he dropped out Dec. 21, one of the early casualties of Trump's astounding campaign.

Trump is regarded by some voters as being harsh and divisive.

However the deadly attacks in Benghazi, Libya, could be Hillary Clinton's Achilles heel, Graham told the Tribune-Review.

“Benghazi is a story of being asleep at the switch,” Graham said. “It's the closest she's been to being commander in chief. It became a death trap on her watch.”

In its 800-page report, the House Benghazi committee pointed specifically to Clinton's actions before, during or after the Sept. 11, 2012, attacks on the U.S. diplomatic outpost and CIA annex in the eastern Libyan city.

“During their hour of greatest need, nobody came to their aid. And after the attack, I think she and others misled the public. I don't think that goes down well with the American people,” Graham said.

Graham said the FBI's recently closed investigation into Clinton's use of a private server was “damning.”

Toomey told the audience that the country needs to take a harder stance on fighting terrorism.

“When you catch the bad guy, you put them someplace safe and secure and away from here like Guantanamo Bay,” Toomey said. “My only criticism of Guantanamo Bay is there's too many empty beds.”

Graham and Scott will spend the week campaigning for candidates in critical Senate races.

The Associated Press contributed. Tony Raap is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7827 or traap@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me