ShareThis Page

Pittsburgh police charge protesters accused of attacking motorist

Megan Guza
| Friday, July 20, 2018, 8:42 p.m.

Pittsburgh police on Friday filed assault charges against two men who allegedly attacked a driver during a protest march Monday.

The incident happened during a protest march in Downtown demanding justice for Antwon Rose II, the unarmed black teenager shot and killed by an East Pittsburgh police officer last month as he ran from the scene of a crime investigation.

The protest began at the City-County Building on Grant Street, and protesters marched down the street to the intersection of Grant and Third streets, according to Public Safety spokesman Chris Togneri.

Togneri said video evidence and witness testimony shows two men — identified as Ahmad Abu Ibrahim and Jason Lamonte Nunley — opening the door of a truck that was swarmed by protesters.

Police said Ibrahim opened the driver’s door and punched the man, and Nunley took the keys from the ignition and threw them in a sewer.

Ibrahim, 38, of Monroeville, is charged with simple assault. Nunley, 38, of Penn Hills, is charged with theft by unlawful taking.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me