ShareThis Page

Government concedes negligence in Legionnaires' lawsuit

| Monday, Feb. 3, 2014, 5:15 p.m.

House legislation that would make it illegal for veterans hospitals nationwide to conceal disease outbreaks won passage on Monday evening with bipartisan approval.

Supporters argued a fatal outbreak of Legionnaires' disease in the VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System shows a need for the transparency rules, which would require VA hospitals to report promptly cases of infectious disease to state and local health departments.

Separately, the federal government agreed Monday that a World War II veteran contracted Legionnaires because of government negligence at the VA's University Drive hospital in Oakland.

Lawmakers from across Western Pennsylvania said veterans deserve better.

“We owe it to them and their families to make sure that at least some good comes from this tragic incident,” said Rep. Mike Doyle, D-Forest Hills.

He was one of several members of the Pennsylvania delegation who called for more thorough disease disclosures and institutional accountability since federal reviews linked at least five patient deaths to the Legionnaires' outbreak from February 2011 to November 2012. Reviewers tied 16 non-fatal cases to bacteria-tainted tap water at VA campuses in Oakland and O'Hara.

Hospitals run by the Department of Veterans Affairs now report disease cases to state and local health officials on a voluntary basis, a fact that lawmakers spotlighted after the Pittsburgh outbreak. Local VA officials delayed notifying the Pennsylvania Department of Health in at least one-third of the outbreak-linked cases but faced no penalties for the lag time, the Tribune-Review found.

Reporting delays can inhibit public health efforts to identify and contain outbreaks as they develop, doctors have said. State-licensed hospitals risk sanctions if they do not disclose infectious diseases within state-established guidelines. Many states, including Pennsylvania, mandate the reports within one day of a diagnosis, though VA hospitals escape those requirements.

House Resolution 357 would direct VA hospitals to meet standard disclosure rules in the states where they operate and could open them to penalties when they do not. The House voted 390-0 on the resolution.

“This inconsistency makes absolutely no sense and leaves the VA off the hook,” said Rep. Mike Kelly, R-Butler, who joined Doyle, Rep. Tim Murphy, R-Upper St. Clair, and Rep. Keith Rothfus, R-Sewickley, in support of the bill.

A similar version introduced by Sen. Bob Casey, D-Scranton, is expected to reach a Senate vote later this week and merge with the House version before going to President Obama.

Several families of identified outbreak victims have sued or announced plans for wrongful death litigation. In one case, lawyers for the government and victim William E. Nicklas' widow filed a pretrial motion on Monday agreeing that government negligence led to his case of Legionnaires' disease, a severe form of pneumonia.

The agreement will shorten the length of the trial scheduled for mid-July but doesn't resolve the central claim that Legionnaires' disease caused Nicklas' death, said Harry S. Cohen, one of the attorneys for Greta M. Nicklas, 81, of Hampton.

A VA spokeswoman referred questions to the Justice Department, where an attorney could not be reached for comment. VA officials testified in June that they would support voluntary reporting guidelines for infectious diseases but agree public disclosures are important. After the Pittsburgh outbreak, they directed VA hospitals nationwide to follow state and regional disclosure rules on a voluntary basis.

Adam Smeltz and Brian Bowling are staff writers for Trib Total Media. Reach Smeltz at 412-380-5676 or Reach Bowling at 412-325-4301 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me