ShareThis Page
News

Man sentenced in meth smuggling scheme

| Friday, Feb. 27, 2015, 4:22 p.m.

An Oakland man who smuggled 889 grams of methamphetamine into the country from Mexico by having it stuffed into the frames of two large pictures of religious figures will spend five years in prison, a federal judge ruled Friday.

Carmelo Rojas-Perez, 31, pleaded guilty in October to conspiring to import the drug and to possessing it with the intent to sell it.

U.S. District Judge Joy Flowers Conti also sentenced Rojas-Perez to five years of probation. Although he'll be deported to Mexico shortly after his release from prison, re-entering the country would be a violation of his probation, she said.

If that happens, “you're facing significant time in jail,” Conti said.

Rojas-Perez, who has been in the country illegally since 1993, told police that he paid for the drugs by wiring money to Mexico $1,000 at a time because he would need a Social Security number to send a larger amount, according to an affidavit by Michael O'Neill, a special agent with Homeland Security Investigations.

He had a friend from his boyhood home of Toluca, Mexico, send a test package before shipping the art with the meth, prosecutors say. The friend shipped the art to Las Palmas, an Oakland store, where Rojas-Perez retrieved the pictures and took them home, prosecutors said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me