ShareThis Page

Brown withdraws name from consideration to lead Pa. state police

| Monday, June 15, 2015, 1:47 p.m.
Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf appointed Col. Marcus Brown on Thursday as director of the Governor’s Office of Homeland Security.
Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf appointed Col. Marcus Brown on Thursday as director of the Governor’s Office of Homeland Security.

HARRISBURG — Gov. Tom Wolf's choice for commissioner of the Pennsylvania State Police withdrew his name from consideration Monday.

Wolf said Col. Marcus Brown would continue as acting commissioner until the governor selects another nominee.

Wolf described Brown as “the type of leader that Pennsylvania would be lucky to have.” Despite his “vast and unquestioned qualifications,” Wolf said, “the Senate wrongfully rejected his nomination in a move that put politics above the best interests of the people of Pennsylvania.”

In a brief statement acknowledging his withdrawal, Brown thanked the governor for the opportunity.

“It has been an honor leading the state police, and the men and women of this organization are of the highest caliber,” he said.

Republicans last week refused to honor Wolf's request to recall Brown's nomination and denied him confirmation to head the agency with 4,500 troopers. The vote against Brown was 26-22. Three Republicans voted with Senate Democrats after a contentious debate that focused on Brown's judgment.

“Wolf had confidence in him,” said Philip Harold, political science professor at Robert Morris University in Moon. “It didn't work out. (Wolf) needs to move on.”

Brown's withdrawal was by mutual agreement, said Jeffrey Sheridan, Wolf's spokesman.

Asked whether Wolf decided to seek someone else because of the June 30 deadline for a state budget, Sheridan said: “The governor is very much focused on the budget.”

It was a rare move for the Senate to vote down a governor's nominee, senators said. It last happened in the 1990s.

Senate GOP leaders respect Brown for his decision, spokeswoman Jennifer Kocher said.

“We look forward to reviewing Gov. Wolf's future candidate for state police commissioner,” she said. The state constitution “provides a specific process for the nomination and confirmation of many state appointments such as this,” she said, with “a full vetting of candidates, including hearings, questioning and votes by the full Senate body.”

Brown, a Central Pennsylvania native, began his career as a beat cop in San Jose, Calif. He commanded a SWAT unit in Baltimore and was the city's deputy commissioner for internal affairs. He led the Maryland Transportation Authority police force before becoming superintendent of the Maryland State Police.

Brown's opponents in the Senate cited lingering questions about his actions, such as removing yard signs that criticized him from a public right-of-way. The signs were put up by an ex-trooper who took Brown to task for wearing the state police uniform even though he did not attend the academy.

Brown has since said he removed the signs with his children in mind and that he “made a mistake.” He wears the uniform to honor those who wear it, he told senators.

Wolf said he will look for another leader who can build on the agency's traditions “while looking for opportunities to ensure that the force reflects the diversity of Pennsylvania.” The governor had commended Brown for diversifying the Maryland State Police.

Brad Bumsted is Trib Total Media's state Capitol reporter. Reach him at 717-787-1405 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me