ShareThis Page

North Allegheny school board OKs technology plan, tax increase

| Wednesday, June 24, 2015, 11:50 p.m.

The North Allegheny School District's plan to give every first- through 12th-grader an iPad or laptop over four years will be helped by a tax increase approved Wednesday.

The school board voted 6-3 to approve a $143.6 million budget for 2015-16 that factored in a tax rate increase — from 17.4039 mills to 18.0011 mills — that will help fund the technology plan. School board members Libby Blackburn, Maureen M. Grosheider and Thomas C. Schwartzmier voted against the budget.

Some school board members said that while they favored the technology plan, the district needed more detailed and earlier planning for future budgets because of projected deficits.

“I'm struggling with this budget. I'm not very happy with it,” school board member Joseph Greenberg said. He said an estimated $3.8 million deficit was projected for the 2016-17 school year.

Other costs affecting the district's expenses include state-mandated, increasing contributions to the Public School Employees Retirement System.

The school board took the decision to raise taxes seriously, said board President Tara Fisher, who agreed that more analysis is needed for future budgets to balance students' needs and taxpayers' concerns.

The board approved a financing package from Laurel Capital Corp. for $2.4 million over four years to buy laptops, iPads and other supplies for the technology plan.

Sixth-, ninth- and 10th-graders will receive electronic devices in the program's first year. Other grades will be added in successive years.

With the new tax rate, district taxes on a house assessed at $182,900, the median value in McCandless, will be $3,292. Taxes on a house assessed at $258,600, the median value in Franklin Park, will be $4,655.

Tory N. Parrish is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me