ShareThis Page

Penn Hills Board promotes acting superintendent to superintendent

| Monday, June 29, 2015, 5:10 p.m.

The Penn Hills School Board promoted its acting superintendent to the top spot in the district Monday night.

Directors voted 7-0 to give Nancy Hines, 50, of Penn Hills the superintendent's position at an annual salary of $140,000 plus benefits. Hines has been the district's assistant superintendent.

Board member Jennifer Burgess-Johnson was absent.

“I'm very pleased and honored. I know we have a monumental task ahead of us,” Hines said.

The district finished the 2013-14 school year with an $8.9 million deficit, and officials anticipate a similar shortfall for the 2014-15 school year. Administrators accepted a pay freeze for next year at the board's request.

The school board seeks to borrow up to $18 million to pay for operational expenses, and officials have said annual increases in the property-tax rate should be expected.

The board adopted an $87.8 million budget Monday with a 0.65-mill property tax increase.

Former board member Carolyn Faggioli asked why a wider search for a superintendent wasn't conducted.

“We don't need a search. We have a great candidate sitting right in front of us,” board member Robert Hudak said.

Steve Robinson, Pennsylvania School Boards Association spokesman, said districts are not legally required to post open superintendent positions. The board established the assistant superintendent's position in May 2014 and hired Hines for the spot in June, paying her a $125,000 annual salary.

Superintendent Thomas Washington resigned Jan. 26, and Hines moved into the role of acting superintendent Feb. 1.

Washington's annual salary was $161,000.

The board has since eliminated the position of assistant superintendent and three other administrative and clerical positions for 2015-16.

Hines' three-year contract specifies that she will receive no salary increases.

Kelsey Shea is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7845 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me