ShareThis Page
News

Pa. House debates aid to Penn State, Pitt and other state-related schools

| Monday, Jan. 11, 2016, 4:15 p.m.

HARRISBURG — A push by the state House Republican majority to bypass a months-old state budget standoff and free up $578 million for state-related universities foundered Monday as party leaders failed to attract the required two-thirds majority.

Bills containing the annual state appropriations for four universities — Penn State, Pitt, Temple and Lincoln — and the University of Pennsylvania's veterinary school have languished as lawmakers from both major parties and Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf struggled to make a deal on a state budget for the fiscal year that began July 1.

GOP proponents of immediately approving the university appropriations argued that negotiators for all sides supported the increases of at least 5 percent and contended that the cost could be absorbed by spending that the governor cut from a scaled-down GOP budget plan approved last month.

Wolf released most of the spending in the $30.3 billion GOP budget, including some long-delayed funding for schools and social services. He supports a $30.8 billion alternative that calls for about $500 million more in spending than the GOP plan and unspecified tax increases totaling more than $1 billion.

Majority Leader Dave Reed said lawmakers should approve the bills and “keep our commitment” to the universities and their students, now halfway through the academic year.

“The math adds up,” Rep. William Adolph, chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, said in urging that the bills be approved. “I know how people in this chamber feel about Penn State University.”

Democrats said approving an appropriation for non-state entities before a complete state budget is in place could violate the state constitution.

It's “an exercise in wishful thinking. The money is not there,” said Rep. Dan Frankel, D-Squirrel Hill. “We are on our way to a train wreck.”

Rep. Frank Dermody of Oakmont, the House minority leader, said enacting the university bills would amount to “teasing the students of the commonwealth because there's no money to pay for it.”

“It's time to tell the people of Pennsylvania the truth,” he said.

One by one, the bills fell at least 19 votes short of the needed 134-vote majority.

Most of the proposed increases are 5 percent, but Lincoln would get 7 percent boost and the Pennsylvania College of Technology, a Penn State affiliate, would get an 11 percent increase.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me