ShareThis Page
News

Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority board chairman linked with company hired to do public relations

Bob Bauder
| Wednesday, Aug. 8, 2012, 12:01 a.m.

One of Pittsburgh's financial oversight agencies recently awarded a $3,000-a-month contract, which runs indefinitely, to a lobbying and communications firm with close ties to the chairman of the agency's board.

The Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority's board voted unanimously on June 29 at a public meeting to hire Bravo Group of Harrisburg for public relations services.

ICA board Chairman Dana A. Yealy said Bill Miller, senior director for the Bravo Group and head of the firm's Western Pennsylvania operations, worked for him as manager of government relations at Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh, Downtown. Yealy, 53, of Marshall is general counsel for the bank.

Miller said he left the bank for Bravo in September 2010, adding that he did not report directly to Yealy.

Yealy said he has no financial stake in Bravo and voted to approve the contract on the recommendation of the ICA's communications committee. The board hired Bravo to inform the public and policymakers about Pittsburgh's financial condition, Yealy said.

ICA Executive Director Henry Sciortino said “four or five” other companies bid on the contract. It wasn't clear whether Bravo submitted the low bid. Yealy referred questions about the bids to the communications committee. Its chairwoman, Ann Dugan, did not return a phone call.

“I have no friendship, interest or any other relationship (with Bravo),” Yealy said. “They are a proven vendor that was looked at by the committee and vetted by the committee.”

Sciortino said Yealy disclosed his relationship with Miller privately to other board members and told them that Miller did “great work.”

“Because you know someone, I don't think that inherently is a conflict, especially if you know what their professional capabilities are,” Sciortino said.”

State law prohibits ICA board members from being “a party to or be interested in any contract or agreement with the authority.” A member found in violation can be ousted from the board and the contract voided, according to the law.

Observers said the contract gives the appearance of favoritism.

“When you have that kind of incestuous relationship, it doesn't look good,” said Barry Kauffman, executive director of Pennsylvania Common Cause, a government watchdog group. “I think government agencies should always strive to avoid situations that may make the public develop a sense of mistrust.”

The state Legislature created the ICA in 2004 to return the city to financial independence, while working with an Act 47 recovery team to reduce debt and a $1 billion employee pension obligation.

The Mayor's Office has complained that it has taken sufficient steps to escape state oversight. Mayor Luke Ravenstahl did not respond to requests for comment.

The governor and legislative political caucuses each appoint one member to the ICA board. House Republicans appointed Yealy in September 2011.

House Speaker Sam Smith of Punxsutawney and Majority Leader Mike Turzai of Bradford Woods did not return phone calls. The ICA has a state-funded annual budget of $228,000.

Jeff Brauer, professor of political science at Keystone College, said the law's intent is to prohibit board members from benefitting financially from a contract.

“The real question of wrongdoing goes to what the process was and was the process followed,” he said. “If the process was followed it may be legal, but whether it was ethical is another question.”

The state recently hired the Bravo Group for about $250,000 to help educate people about the new voter-ID law. Company CEO Christopher Bravacos has contributed more than $30,000 to Republican candidates and causes since 2000.

Bob Bauder is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me