ShareThis Page
News

Newsmaker: Judge Kim Berkeley Clark

| Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, 12:02 a.m.
Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge Kim Berkeley Clark will be honored next month at the Women's Bar Association's annual Susan B. Anthony reception as the individual who most exemplifies the objectives and goals by promoting equality in the legal profession.
Submitted
Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge Kim Berkeley Clark will be honored next month at the Women's Bar Association's annual Susan B. Anthony reception as the individual who most exemplifies the objectives and goals by promoting equality in the legal profession. Submitted

Noteworthy: Clark will be honored next month at the Women's Bar Association's annual Susan B. Anthony reception as the individual who most exemplifies the association's objectives and goals by promoting equality in the legal profession.

Age: 56

Residence: North Side

Family: Husband, Walter Hales Jr.

Occupation: Judge, Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas Family Division

Background: Clark was appointed to the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas by Gov. Tom Ridge in March 1999 and was elected to a full 10-year term in November of that year. Clark served as the administrative judge of the Family Division from 2006 to 2009, becoming the first black to be appointed to the position. She has been appointed to serve as a member of the Pennsylvania Interbranch Commission on Racial, Gender and Ethnic Fairness, and the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency — Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Committee. Before serving as judge, Clark was as an assistant and deputy district attorney in Allegheny County.

Education: Bachelor's degree in French from Tennessee State University; law degree from Duquesne University

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me