ShareThis Page
News

Newsmaker: Lilas Soukup

Tom Fontaine
| Thursday, Sept. 12, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
The Pittsburgh Federal Executive Board selected Lisa Soukup as its 2013 Woman of the Year. Soukup is the newsmaker for Sept. 12, 2013,
The Pittsburgh Federal Executive Board selected Lisa Soukup as its 2013 Woman of the Year. Soukup is the newsmaker for Sept. 12, 2013,

Noteworthy: The Pittsburgh Federal Executive Board selected Soukup as its 2013 Woman of the Year, citing her leadership of the National Energy Technology Laboratory's Federal Women's Program for the past 15 years. The board represents more than 20,000 employees from more than 100 federal agencies in the Pittsburgh region.

Age: 51

Residence: South Park

Family: Single

Occupation: Public affairs specialist at the National Energy Technology Laboratory in South Park.

Education: Soukup earned an associate's degree in business administration from the Community College of Allegheny County and studied computer science at Penn State University.

Background: Soukup has worked at the National Energy Technology Laboratory for 35 years, holding finance and information-technology positions. She has coordinated the laboratory's Federal Women's Program for 15 years, ensuring that women are treated equally in the workplace and addressing their concerns.

Quote: “In the past few years, I have watched numerous young women here achieve more than previous generations of women could have dreamed. I am proud to have been part of such a positive change at the National Energy Technology Laboratory.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me