ShareThis Page

Newsmaker: James Bogen

| Saturday, Nov. 30, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Noteworthy: The American Association for the Advancement of Science has named Bogen an fellow for his research in the philosophy of science, including analyses of brain imaging. The association is an international nonprofit group that publishes the journal Science.

Age: 78

Residence: Highland Park

Family: Wife, Deborah; four daughters, Wendy, Robin, Aubrey and Carlotta; three sons-in-law; and four grandchildren.

Occupation: Bogen is an adjunct faculty member in the Department of History and Philosophy of Science at the University of Pittsburgh.

Education: Bachelor's in philosophy from Pomona College, 1957; master's in philosophy from the University of California, Berkeley, 1959; doctorate in philosophy from the University of California, Berkeley, 1968.

Background: Bogen worked as a faculty member at Oberlin College in Oberlin, Ohio, and Pitzer College in Claremont, Calif., before moving to Pittsburgh in 2000 and working in Pitt's Center for the Philosophy of Science. Now largely retired, Bogen has studied how scientists produce and use evidence to conduct research in neuroscience and other critical fields. He believes advancements in digital imaging could help researchers develop new treatments for brain ailments.

Quote: “This is an amazing time to study neuroscience. I think it's the equivalent of studying physics at the time of Newton. The field is exploding.”

—by Adam Smeltz

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me