ShareThis Page

VA bills aim at outbreaks

| Sunday, Feb. 2, 2014, 12:21 a.m.

The House of Representatives next week will consider legislation that would require veterans hospitals to disclose cases of infectious disease promptly to state and local health officials.

Federal hospitals run by the Department of Veterans Affairs now disclose cases on a voluntary basis, a point highlighted by lawmakers after a deadly Legionnaires' disease outbreak struck the VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System from February 2011 to November 2012. Pittsburgh VA officials delayed notifying state officials in at least one-third of 21 outbreak-linked cases but faced no penalties for the lag time, the Tribune-Review found.

Federal reviewers linked five patient deaths to the outbreak.

Doctors say reporting delays can hobble public health efforts to contain outbreaks as they develop, and state-licensed hospitals risk sanctions if they do not disclose infectious diseases within state-established guidelines. Many, including Pennsylvania, mandate reports within 24 hours of a diagnosis.

β€œFor the health and safety of our veterans, and all those who work in the facility to serve them, the VA must follow the same disease β€” and infection β€” reporting requirements every other hospital must abide by,” Rep. Tim Murphy, R-Upper St. Clair, said in a prepared statement Friday.

He worked with Rep. Mike Doyle, D-Forest Hills, and other lawmakers to draft bills that would bring VA hospitals under more uniform disclosure requirements. Some proposals would prescribe fines or allow civil lawsuits for failures to comply. Sen. Bob Casey Jr., D-Scranton, introduced similar legislation.

Provisions of the House bills are slated for debate on Monday. After the Pittsburgh outbreak, VA leaders ordered federal hospitals nationwide to comply with disclosure rules in their respective counties and states. The department would prefer voluntary reporting rules and an exemption from proposed fines, VA leaders have said.

Adam Smeltz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me