ShareThis Page

Newsmaker: Everette James

| Monday, Sept. 8, 2014, 10:57 p.m.
(file photo) - Everette James, 52, of Fox Chapel. Pitt professor who received the Pond Chair in Health Policy and Management at the Pitt Graduate School of Public Health
(file photo) - Everette James, 52, of Fox Chapel. Pitt professor who received the Pond Chair in Health Policy and Management at the Pitt Graduate School of Public Health

Noteworthy: James was appointed to the M. Allen Pond Chair in Health Policy and Management at the University of Pittsburgh's Graduate School of Public Health. Pond served as assistant U.S. Surgeon General from 1963 to 1968 and later worked at Pitt. The award honors faculty that have made significant contribution to public health policy.

Age: 52

Residence: Fox Chapel

Family: Wife, Gretchen; daughters, Katie, 15, Charlotte, 12.

Occupation: Professor of health policy and management at Pitt; executive director of Pitt's Health Policy Institute.

Background: James has worked at Pitt for the last 3½ years. He served as Secretary of Health under Gov. Ed Rendell and worked for the federal government as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Service Industries and Finance at the Department of Commerce.

Education: Law degree and Master of Business Administration, Illinois Institute of Technology; bachelor's degree, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Quote: “Given Allen Pond's distinguished service, I was very honored to receive the award. I hope we can share the findings from our research at Pitt to improve health policy in our region and the United States.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me