ShareThis Page

Allegheny County Controller Wagner may shop for heat if audit bid nixed

Aaron Aupperlee
| Monday, Sept. 8, 2014, 10:57 p.m.
The Pittsburgh Allegheny County Thermal building.
Sidney Davis | Trib Total Media
The Pittsburgh Allegheny County Thermal building.

The Allegheny County Controller's Office could recommend the county find a new way to heat its Downtown buildings if a legal challenge to its authority to audit the steam supplier continues, Controller Chelsa Wagner said on Monday.

Pittsburgh Allegheny County Thermal, a nonprofit that supplies steam to more than 50 buildings Downtown, sued to stop Wagner's office from performing a follow-up audit it claims meddles too much in its affairs.

“They don't have the legal right to audit a private organization in the sense that they want to audit the whole company,” PACT President Robert Fazio said. “They are perfectly welcome to audit the amount of money that they pay us for the services that we provide them, and that's where it stops.”

The county pays PACT about $2.4 million a year to heat and cool the courthouse, jail, former morgue and county office buildings. The county is the largest of its 56 customers, Fazio said. PACT heats and cools buildings for the city, the Sports and Exhibition Authority and private companies Downtown.

Wagner released an audit in February 2013 that claimed PACT overcharged taxpayers and wasted money on contracts. The audit questioned the nonprofit's governance, its auditor and why its customer base slipped from 102 in 1992 to 56 today.

The controller's attempt to perform a follow-up audit this year prompted PACT to sue the county on May 8.

“I think that's very telling,” Wagner said. “I think it's very telling of mismanagement and waste.”

Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge Terrence W. O'Brien on Aug. 6 threw out the county's request to get the lawsuit dismissed.

PACT wants a judge to remove it from the county administrative code as a county-sponsored or county-supported nonprofit that is subject to a comprehensive audit, such as the Carnegie Library Board and the Allegheny League of Municipalities. Fazio said PACT provides the county with annual financial statements.

The county has argued that the administrative code and the company's own bylaws allow the audit. Fazio said PACT has complied with some of Wagner's suggestions but did not go into detail.

Wagner did not recommend the county drop PACT as its heat source after the 2013 audit. She said she plans, however, to recommend soon the county pursue alternative ways of heating buildings.

Fazio said that would cost the county significant money in upgrade costs and could raise other customers' rates.

Aaron Aupperlee is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7986 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me