ShareThis Page
News

Plum School District considers fraternization limits as 2 teachers accused of sex with students

| Wednesday, Feb. 18, 2015, 11:24 p.m.
Jason Cooper, 38, of Penn Hills was charged in February on accusations he had sex with a female student. He was subsequently charged with witness intimidation because police said he called the victim. Cooper is scheduled to go to trial in November.
Submitted
Jason Cooper, 38, of Penn Hills was charged in February on accusations he had sex with a female student. He was subsequently charged with witness intimidation because police said he called the victim. Cooper is scheduled to go to trial in November.
Joseph Ruggieri, 40, of Plum was charged in February on accusations he had sex with a different female student.
WPXI
Joseph Ruggieri, 40, of Plum was charged in February on accusations he had sex with a different female student.
Joseph Ruggieri
Facebook
Joseph Ruggieri

A suburban school district where two teachers are accused of having sex with students has no policy to prevent fraternization between them.

At least one school board member and a parent hope that changes soon.

“I want this in place so employees can see in black and white that we will not tolerate inappropriate behavior,” Plum school director Joseph Tommarello said Wednesday.

Superintendent Timothy Glasspool said although a code of conduct exists for teachers under the Pennsylvania Department of Education's Professional Standards and Practices Commission, it restricts only sexual harassment and sexual relationships.

Tommarello's proposal would restrict employees from entertaining, socializing or spending extra time with students so they don't forge an unprofessional relationship.

It would prohibit teachers from using electronic communications such as text messaging or social media to connect with students “to deter any sort of misconduct,” he said.

Plum parent Amy Williams supports a review of policies in the district, where 4,000 students are enrolled from elementary through high school.

“Everyone needs to take a long, hard look at what procedures there are, so there cannot be a question going forward,” said Williams, whose daughter Jordan, 15, is a sophomore at Plum High School. “Plum has really excellent teachers. ... I hate to see the whole community get tagged with a broad brush based on the alleged actions of a few,” she said.

Prompting discussion

Talk of policy changes arose a day after police arrested English teacher Joseph Ruggieri, 40, of Plum, charging him with one count each of sexual contact with a student and corruption of minors, both felonies.

A week ago, police charged Ruggieri's colleague, chemistry teacher Jason Cooper, 38, with institutional sexual assault, corruption of minors and furnishing alcohol to minors.

Neither Ruggieri nor Cooper could be reached for comment. Both are free on bail, awaiting preliminary hearings. Neither has a criminal record. Cooper's attorney, Mike DeRiso, did not return calls. It was not clear whether Ruggieri has retained counsel.

Ruggieri is vice president of Plum Borough Education Association, which represents 268 teachers. The union's president, Martha Freese, could not be reached.

Plum school board member Richard Zucco said the arrests send a message that the district will not tolerate inappropriate behavior.

“It will make a better atmosphere for students,” Zucco said. Investigators uncovered allegations against Ruggieri while investigating Cooper.

School board President Sal Colella declined to comment.

Plum police Chief Jeffrey Armstrong said the investigation into Ruggieri continues, involving other potential victims.

He said the investigation into Cooper has concluded, and police do not expect to file additional charges.

In Pennsylvania, it's illegal for a teacher to have sex with a student regardless of age or consent.

“If these guys are convicted of the crimes they're accused of doing, we're gonna whack them,” Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. said.

Accusation questioned

Armstrong said a policy restricting out-of-school contact between teachers and students “doesn't guarantee anyone subject to it is going to follow it.”

The Pennsylvania School Boards Association does not have a model policy and does not advise districts on the topic, spokesman Steve Robinson said.

Ruggieri and Cooper have active teacher certifications from the state Department of Education. The superintendent suspended them with pay. Ruggieri is paid $101,500 a year; Cooper, $53,300.

Ruggieri's stepmother, Barbara Ruggieri of Huntington Station, N.Y., about 40 miles east of Manhattan, told the Tribune-Review that he would not jeopardize the career he loves.

“He always kept the teacher-student boundaries very clear,” she said. “He would never take an interest in a young person, especially a student. He loves being a teacher.”

Police said Ruggieri and a female student — identified as “Victim 1” in a criminal complaint — struck up a relationship at the end of last year.

The girl told police she and Ruggieri would meet in the parking lot of the Boyce Campus of the Community College of Allegheny County in Monroeville, communicate via phone and text messages, and have sex in his Plum apartment.

“Definitely, it's got to be the girl is lying,” Barbara Ruggieri said. “He would never ever even think of that.”

Police said Cooper's relationship with a senior girl began when she sought personal advice from him and he provided his personal phone number, according to the criminal complaint. They began talking after school hours, and when she went to his home the first time, he made her alcoholic drinks.

They later kissed, and the relationship turned sexual, the complaint states. They first kissed Dec. 28, and then “on occasion” in his classroom when no other students were around, she told police.

Adam Brandolph and Karen Zapf are Trib Total Media staff writers. Staff writers Kelsey Shea and Gideon Bradshaw contributed.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me