ShareThis Page

Most welcome, but some question plans for Beaver County cracker plant

| Wednesday, May 6, 2015, 7:00 a.m.
Royal Dutch Shell plans to build a petrochemical plant on this site along the Ohio River in Beaver County.  June 23, 2015.
Steven Adams | Trib Total Media
Royal Dutch Shell plans to build a petrochemical plant on this site along the Ohio River in Beaver County. June 23, 2015.

A proposal by Shell Chemical to build a petrochemical plant in Beaver County drew praise from those who say it will boost the region's economy, and criticism from those who fear it will harm the environment, despite assurances from the state Department of Environmental Protection.

“I cannot believe this is happening,” the Rev. James Hamilton of Ambridge said about plans for the so-called “cracker” plant in Potter Township. “We were told by the cigarette industry that everything is wonderful, everything is safe.”

Hamilton's comments came during a two-hour public hearing and question-and-answer session Tuesday night on Shell's plans for the plant on the site of a former zinc smelter once owned by Horsehead Corp. That plant closed in 2011 and the new operation Shell proposes would pipe ethane from Marcellus Shale natural gas wells to the plant, where the liquid fuel would be chemically “cracked” so it can be converted to polyethylene pellets used to make various plastic products.

The ethane is now sent to plants near the Gulf of Mexico for processing. Shell officials said the plant would create 400 to 500 operational jobs and thousands of construction jobs in the meantime.

Mark Gorog, an environmental engineering manager for the DEP, told residents that Shell would seek emissions credits for the nitrogen oxide and other pollutants the plant could produce. If those credits didn't come from other Pittsburgh-area companies, the overall air regional quality wouldn't suffer, Gorog explained.

That didn't satisfy Celia Janosik, a resident of nearby Economy. She said it was “reprehensible” that Shell might be permitted to purchase the credits from manufacturers nowhere near western Pennsylvania that would give the cracker plant a license to produce pollution.

But those who criticized the plan were outnumbered by residents, union officials and business boosters who believe it will be good for the area.

“This proposed project will not only help Beaver County, but it will transform the region for years to come,” said Larry Nelson, an official with International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers 712 and the Beaver County Building and Construction Trades Council.

Although Shell has purchased the former zinc plant and begun pursuing regulatory approvals for the plant, the company said it may take years to decide whether to finally build it.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me