ShareThis Page
Editors Picks

Death penalty to be sought in Craigslist death

| Tuesday, Jan. 21, 2014, 3:39 p.m.

SUNBURY — A prosecutor said Tuesday he will seek the death penalty for a central Pennsylvania couple charged with killing a man allegedly lured through a Craigslist ad.

Aggravating circumstances warrant death sentences for Elytte Barbour, 22, and his 19-year-old wife, Miranda, if they're convicted of first-degree murder, Northumberland County District Attorney Anthony Rosini said.

Rosini said the Barbours tortured 42-year-old Troy LaFerrara and killed him in the commission of a robbery, making the couple eligible for the death penalty.

“We believe that this is an appropriate case in which to seek the death penalty and that a jury would be likely to impose the death penalty,” Rosini said.

Miranda Barbour stabbed LaFerrara of Port Trevorton in the front seat of her car while Elytte Barbour held a cord around his neck from the back seat on Nov. 11, authorities said.

Elytte Barbour allegedly told investigators they committed the crime because they wanted to kill someone together. Miranda Barbour had met LaFerrara on Craigslist, where she offered companionship for a fee, and arranged the meeting that led to his death, police said.

County Chief Public Defender Edward Greco, who is representing Miranda Barbour, said Rosini's decision to seek the death penalty was “not something that we did not expect.”

Elytte Barbour's attorney did not immediately return a phone call seeking comment.

Rosini also said he will seek to have a joint trial for the Barbours, who were married in North Carolina and moved to Pennsylvania weeks before LaFerrara's death.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me