ShareThis Page
Education

CMU near top of Wall Street Journal's college rankings

Jeff Himler
| Monday, Oct. 2, 2017, 3:15 p.m.
Carnegie Mellon University
Carnegie Mellon University
Carnegie Mellon University

Several area institutions of higher learning are among more than 1,000 U.S. universities included in the Wall Street Journal/Times Higher Education College 2017 ranking.

Carnegie Mellon University was ranked 16th overall and the University of Pittsburgh's main campus was ranked 57th while Washington and Jefferson College was listed at No. 197, Duquesne University at No. 221 and St. Vincent College at No. 327, based on information from 2016-17.

Seton Hill University also made the list, as did Pitt's Greensburg campus, Indiana University of Pennsylvania and California University of Pennsylvania.

The review assesses universities on 14 performance indicators while taking into account the results of a survey of 100,000 American college students.

IUP ranked in the top 20 percent of all institutions for engagement, which included a measurement of student engagement, student recommendations and opportunities for student involvement. It also ranked highly in the environment category, which measured international students and student and faculty diversity.

The study additionally looked at each university's resources — its capacity to effectively deliver teaching — and its outcomes — including its graduation rate, value added to graduate salaries and its academic reputation.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me