ShareThis Page
College & Career

Pitt chancellor warns of 'dangerous situation' as state budget negotiations stall

Jamie Martines
| Thursday, Oct. 12, 2017, 2:54 p.m.
Cathedral of Learning
Cathedral of Learning

The University of Pittsburgh is "veering toward a dangerous situation," Chancellor Pat Gallagher warned in a letter to students, faculty and the Pitt community Thursday.

As budget negotiations drag on, nearly $600 million in funding for state-affiliated universities is in limbo. Pitt, Temple, Penn State, Lincoln and Penn's veterinary school are all impacted. Authorization for another $52 million for Penn State's agricultural research and extension programs is also in jeopardy.

The schools provide services to the state and tuition discounts to in-state students.

Pitt's budget was approved this summer with the assumption that it would receive about $150 million in state funding, the letter said.

"However, with our first semester approaching the mid-way point — and no state revenue plan in place — we may be forced to assume that no state funding is forthcoming and amend our University's budget accordingly," Gallagher said in the letter.

This could include increasing in-state tuition, which ranges from about $17,000 for a full-time student per academic year to about $22,000, depending on the school within the university.

Penn State increased tuition for the 2017-18 school year over the summer. In-state residents on average saw a 2.45 percent increase in tuition (about $200, depending on the campus), while non-residents' tuition increased by 3.85 percent, or about $605.

Legislators are not scheduled to return to Harrisburg until Monday.

Jamie Martines is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at, 724-850-2867 or on Twitter @Jamie_Martines.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me