ShareThis Page
Inside the Classroom

Change could cut Pennsylvania standardized test time

Jamie Martines
| Wednesday, Dec. 6, 2017, 1:51 p.m.

Students in Pennsylvania will spend less time sitting for standardized tests.

Gov. Tom Wolf announced changes to the Pennsylvania System of School Assessment on Wednesday that will reduce the window of testing time by a week.

Starting in the 2018-19 school year, the PSSA will be condensed from three weeks to two. It will begin two weeks later than currently scheduled.

This year, it was announced that two sections of the PSSA — one math and one reading — will be removed from the 2017-18 test. The number of questions in the science portion of the assessment also was reduced. Those changes could reduce the time students spend taking the test by up to two days, according to a statement from the governor's office.

The changes stemmed from a new state plan for education, developed in accordance with the federal Every Student Succeeds Act, which replaced the No Child Left Behind Act.

While some local educators and parents during a visit from state officials in August praised efforts to reduce testing time, others pointed out that the changes are unlikely to have a significant impact on the time students spend preparing for the exams throughout the school year.

Currently, students in grades three through eight are required to take the annual PSSA exams in reading and math. Students in fourth and eighth grades also take the science exam.

Exam performance does not impact whether a student can advance to the next grade. It could influence placement in accelerated classes or whether the student qualifies for extra reading or math support.

Many districts now schedule about eight to nine days for testing.

This spring, the PSSA will take place during a three-week testing window beginning April 9.

Jamie Martines is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at, 724-850-2867 or on Twitter @Jamie_Martines.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me