ShareThis Page

'Uniontown Ninja' admits to assault

| Thursday, Oct. 10, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

A Fayette County man who claimed to be a ninja after he allegedly stabbed a woman who confronted him as he rummaged through her car has entered guilty pleas to simple assault and theft from a motor vehicle, both misdemeanors.

Justin Jellots, 29, of South Union appeared on Wednesday before Senior Judge Conrad Capuzzi to enter the pleas in mental health court.

According to a plea sheet Jellots signed after consulting with defense attorney Anthony Dedola of Uniontown, prosecutors have recommended a sentence of six to 12 months incarceration and $530 restitution to the victim.

A more serious felony charge of robbery was withdrawn before the case was transferred from district court to county court.

In a criminal complaint, state police said a woman told them she found a man dressed in black inside her car at 11:45 p.m. April 8 on Southwood Drive in South Union. The man had a black scarf on his face that allowed only his eyes to show, police said, and he swung a knife at the woman, puncturing her left shoulder.

Jellots fled when the victim struck him with her purse and her daughter began yelling out a window at him, police said.

Police said that when they interviewed Jellots, he told them he is known as the “Uniontown Ninja.”

Jellots had been charged in a related case with aggravated assault, simple assault and criminal mischief in connection with an April 24, 2011, incident in South Union in which police said he tried to stab a man with a sword on Elm Street and broke out the windows of 11 cars, according to a criminal complaint.

The charges were dismissed following a preliminary hearing in September before South Union District Judge Joseph George Jr. because the assault victim did not appear to testify and the two-year statute of limitations on the criminal mischief charges had passed.

Liz Zemba is a reporter for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-601-2166 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me