ShareThis Page

Ruffsdale man charged with aggravated assault by vehicle

| Wednesday, Jan. 14, 2015, 12:01 a.m.

A Ruffsdale man was charged with aggravated assault by vehicle because an investigation found him responsible for a vehicle collision in July that caused a severe injury to a Uniontown man.

Clifford S. Eisaman, 34, was charged with aggravated assault by vehicle, accidents involving death or personal injury while not properly licensed, recklessly endangering another person, drivers required to be licensed, following too closely, careless driving, reckless driving and other traffic violations before District Judge Charles Moore.

The charges stem from a two-vehicle collision on Route 31 in South Huntingdon Township about 3:15 p.m. July 24.

According to an affidavit of probable cause, a Chevrolet Lumina driven by Eisaman rear-ended a Volkswagen Bug driven by Linda Sparks and occupied by Timothy Sparks of Uniontown.

Eisaman told police at the scene that the Volkswagen turned in front of his Chevrolet before the impact and that his driver's license was under suspension for DUI.

Linda Sparks told police she put on her turn signal and slowed down to about 10 mph to turn off the road to review directions when the collision occurred.

Police determined that Eisaman's vehicle was traveling 65 mph because there were no skid marks.

Linda and Timothy Sparks were injured in the collision. Timothy Sparks reportedly suffered severe brain trauma.

A preliminary hearing is scheduled 10 a.m. Jan. 28 at Moore's office for Eisaman, who has been released on his own recognizance.

Mark Hofmann is a staff writer with Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-626-3539 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me