Florida school joins list of universities that have had to withdraw acceptance letters | TribLIVE.com

Florida school joins list of universities that have had to withdraw acceptance letters

Deb Erdley

College acceptance notifications are occasion for celebration; but there are some exceptions.

The Tampa Bay Tribune reported that this year’s exception was the University of South Florida, where someone hit a send button that sent email notifications soaring through the ether to some 680 applicants who had applied to the school in sunny St. Petersburg, Fla.

The only problem was the email blast should have been limited to 250 applicants.

The Florida school sheepishly announced the error and said it was in the process of contacting the 430 unlucky email recipients that they did not make the cut.

The university is among a growing list of institutions that have had to own up to similar mistakes.

Four years ago, Carnegie Mellon University confessed to a similar mistake when 800 applicants to its graduate program in computer science received emails erroneously informing them they’d been admitted to the highly competitive program that typically admits only a handful of students.

Months earlier in December 2014, Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore apologized to 294 undergraduate applicants who had received congratulatory emails in error.

The Washington Post reported that Fordham University, Vassar College and the University of California at San Diego are among schools forced to wipe egg from their ivory-covered towers after someone hit the send button in error.

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 724-850-1209, [email protected] or via Twitter @deberdley_trib.

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 724-850-1209, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.