CMU study: Football players can still have brain damage from hits without concussion | TribLIVE.com
Health

CMU study: Football players can still have brain damage from hits without concussion

Emily Balser
1511439_web1_Concussion-brain
File photo
A magnetic resonance imaging scan of the human brain.

Football players can still experience brain damage from repeated hits to the head even if they don’t result in a concussion, according to a study released Wednesday involving researchers from Carnegie Mellon.

The news comes as teams across the country prepare to begin their football seasons this month.

The study, conducted by Carnegie Mellon University and University of Rochester Medical Center, studied for three years the effects of repeated hits to the head during games and practices on 38 football players at the University of Rochester.

Only two of the players suffered concussions, but the study found a significant decrease in white matter in the midbrain of two-thirds of the players between the beginning and end of the season.

The more white-matter damage the player had was directly related to the number of hits the player sustained, said Brad Mahon, associate professor of psychology at CMU and one of the project researchers.

Mahon said that much of the research up until now has been done on the big hits and concussions, but more and more research has shown that all of the little hits can add up to damage as well.

Mahon said while they aren’t the first researchers to discover this link, they hope they can get the information out to more people, including players and parents of players.

“I think that we already have seen enough to know the routine hits that players can expect to have in the course of playing football, even if they never suffer a concussion, have a high likelihood of having long-term changes to their brain,” he said.

What the long-term effects of that damage may be could vary and more research is needed to know exactly, Mahon said.

Researchers were able to measure the hits each player sustained through helmets with embedded sensors that measured the force and the direction of the impact. Players also had MRI brain scans at the beginning and end of each season.

According to the study, the midbrain is responsible for movement of the eyes, hearing, memory, consciousness and nervous system function.

“White matter is absolutely critical to every aspect of brain functions,” Mahon said.

The midbrain also is the site of damage in patients with chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a neurodegenerative disease associated with exposure to repetitive head impacts.

CTE was discovered after Dr. Bennet Omalu, a former Allegheny County deputy coroner, performed an autopsy on former Pittsburgh Steelers center Mike Webster in 2002. It has since been found in the brains of dozens of former players.

Mahon said that while it could happen, not all people with white-matter damage will end up with CTE or other long-term effects.

To learn more about the study, visit www.openbrainproject.org.

Officials with the University of Rochester’s athletic department declined to comment on the study.

Emily Balser is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Emily at 724-226-4680, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Health Now | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.