Inside the new colorectal cancer screening guidelines for average-risk patients |

Inside the new colorectal cancer screening guidelines for average-risk patients

When it comes to colorectal cancer screenings, the best test is the one the patient will undergo, says Dr. Frank Sinicrope, a Mayo Clinic gastroenterologist and medical oncologist.
Doctors and patients should consider benefits, risks, frequency, cost and patient preferences when scheduling colorectal cancer tests and screenings.

The American College of Physicians has produced a guidance statement for colorectal cancer screening for patients who are at an average risk. This statement is based on a critical review of existing national guidelines.

“Patients who are age 50 to 75 who are asymptomatic, and don’t have prior precancerous polyps or a family history of colorectal cancer, are considered average risk,” says Dr. Frank Sinicrope, a Mayo Clinic gastroenterologist and medical oncologist.

While various groups have offered colorectal screening guidelines, the American College of Physician’s guidance statement is meant to give health care providers recommendations based on available data on when and how to appropriately screen average-risk adults for colorectal cancer.

“While several screening options are available, it is recommended that doctors discuss options with their patients and consider a variety of factors, such as benefits, risks, frequency, cost and patient preferences. All of these factors are important in making a recommendation to the patient for screening,” says Sinicrope.

“The American Cancer Society moved the age to begin screening down to 45 years. However, their guideline is the only one that has made that recommendation thus far,” says Sinicrope. “There’s not enough data to recommend that screening begin earlier than age 50 at this time.

“We know that colorectal cancer is a disease of aging and that the number of new cases increases as we get older.”

Suggested tests

Colorectal cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer-related death among people in the U.S. It can affect anyone at any age. However, it typically affects older adults.

Recommended colorectal cancer screening tests include stool-based studies and direct visualization tests, such as flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy.

These are the suggested screening tests and intervals:

— Fecal immunochemical test or high-sensitivity, guaiac-based fecal occult blood test. This test is recommended every two years.

— Colonoscopy. This test is recommended every 10 years.

— Flexible sigmoidoscopy. This test is recommended every 10 years, along with a fecal immunochemical test every two years.

Sinicrope says it is important to note that any abnormal stool-based screening test will require that a colonoscopy be performed.

Selecting a test

When selecting a screening test, considerations include benefits and potential risks.

For example, colonoscopy risks include bleeding or perforation. These risks are relatively uncommon, but are increased in patients who are elderly and in those with certain underlying diseases.

The screening guidelines are for average-risk patients and do not apply to those at increased risk, such as those with a history of precancerous polyps of the colon or family history of colorectal cancer, or those who have inflammatory bowel disease.

Sinicrope says it’s important that everyone have some form of colorectal cancer screening, beginning at the age of 50, because screening saves lives.

“There is a menu of tests available, and people should discuss with their doctor what test may be best for them,” he says. “We generally say that the best screening test is the one that the patient will undergo and comply with. We want everybody screened.”

Categories: News | Health Now
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.