It’s Alexa versus Big Pharma in Penn State research labs | TribLIVE.com
Health

It’s Alexa versus Big Pharma in Penn State research labs

Deb Erdley
1061192_web1_ptr-AmazonEchoDotB
Amazon

Could Alexa replace Big Pharma when it comes to pain control?

In a news release touting their ongoing programs in information sciences, researchers at Penn State said they believe they can deliver pain control through guided mindfulness practices via Amazon’s Alexa.

“In particular with opioid addiction, there has been quite a bit of progress in coming up with methods that are non-addictive, and mindfulness is one of them,” Saeed Abdullah, the project’s primary investigator, told Penn State News. He’s an assistant professor of information sciences and technology.

Advocates have long contended that Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction techniques can help those suffering with chronic pain without resorting to prescription drugs or opioids. But as in all else in life, consistency is a problem. Researchers said they’re working to come up with a program that would aid patients in their efforts to practice mindfulness through a virtual coach.

“There are many (Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction) applications for smart phones, but the one challenge, especially for people who are in chronic pain, is even getting to their smartphone device or finding another mechanism if they want a guided practice,” says Stephanie Lanza, professor in the Penn State Department of Biobehavioral Health. “With Alexa, you don’t have to get up from your seat to access the practices.”

The Penn State researchers said making it easier to practice mindfulness via Alexa and expanding the use of mindfulness for chronic pain management might help prevent opioid addiction.

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 724-850-1209, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Health Now
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.