ShareThis Page
Recalls of romaine, Goldfish are only the tip of the contamination iceberg |

Recalls of romaine, Goldfish are only the tip of the contamination iceberg

Carmen Reinicke, Bloomberg
| Thursday, January 17, 2019 9:59 a.m

If it feels like you’re reading about a new food recall practically everyday, it’s not all in your head — or stomach.

A report released Thursday by the U.S. PIRG Education Fund found that recalls of food have increased 10 percent since 2013, with meat and poultry incidents soaring 67 percent. The most hazardous — Class 1 recalls, or when there’s a “reasonable probability that eating the food will cause health problems or death” — edged up 6 percent overall and a whopping 83 percent for meat and poultry, the study found.

The authors aren’t sure whether the uptick in recalls is due to a more contaminated food supply or simply because new technology makes it easier to catch bacteria in products. Either way, the authors argue, any number of recalls is too high since no consumer should have to worry that food purchased at a grocery store will make them sick.

“We’re doing better but we clearly still have a gap here,” co-author Adam Garber said. “We eat more meat and it’s less safe, so that’s very concerning.”

Recalled food can often be traced back to contamination that occurs during production, like the romaine lettuce recalled from Yuma, Arizona, last spring. After an E. coli outbreak killed five people and made more than 200 ill, the Food and Drug Administration determined that infested water used to irrigate the crop was likely to blame.

That was just one of several recalls last year to generate panic — and press. A separate lettuce recall in late 2018 had consumers and restaurant chains alike scrambling for salad alternatives. In the final months of 2018, Jennie-O recalled hundreds of thousands of pounds of turkey potentially infected with salmonella. Kellogg Co. issued a nationwide recall of its Honey Smacks cereal in June after a salmonella outbreak; the next month, Campbell Soup recalled four varieties of Goldfish crackers over a similar contamination risk.

Still, while overall recall levels are up from 2013, they are trending down from recent highs. This could be due to updated food safety laws from the FDA Food Safety and Modernization Act that went into effect for different sites starting in 2016, Garber said.

But food safety experts argue that the number of recalls should be zero.

“We still have a problem with our system,” said Sarah Sorscher, deputy director of regulatory affairs at the Center for Science in the Public Interest. “We don’t ever want to see people getting sick.”

Categories: News | Health Now
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.