ShareThis Page
The whole truth? Patients often conceal details from doctors |

The whole truth? Patients often conceal details from doctors

Kate Scannell
| Tuesday, January 15, 2019 1:30 a.m
Creative Commons
A new medical study upholds an old truth that patients frequently conceal medical information from health care providers.

A new medical study upholds an old truth about patients deceiving their health care providers: It happens a lot.

The deception is, of course, mutual.

In medical journals, it’s generally referred to as “nondisclosure” or “withholding.” On the TV drama “House,” it was called “lying” and the lead character, Dr. House, famously claimed that everyone did it.

Whatever you call it, we know that patients and providers frequently conceal medical information from one another. Doctors, for example, might withhold information about bleak prognoses, their financial conflicts of interest or medical errors.

Patients might misrepresent their alcohol intake and exercise. (In medical school, I was advised to double a patient’s estimate of their alcohol intake, and to halve their reported exercise hours.)

Irreparable harm

But deliberately withholding information can be harmful and unwise. If a doctor withholds information about a cancer’s spread, a patient can’t make rational decisions about treatment. If a patient withholds the truth about their alcohol consumption, a doctor can’t correctly diagnose their liver disease or tremors.

Health care dollars are wasted chasing incoherent diagnostic considerations and illogical therapies that are rooted in misleading premises and inadequate understanding. And if the deception is ultimately exposed, the relationship between a patient and provider can suffer irreparable harm.

So, if deception can cause such serious side effects, why do patients and providers keep tolerating it?

The new medical study, published in November’s JAMA Network Open, sheds new light on this question, illuminated by the perspectives of 4,510 adult patients in the United States.

From online surveys, researchers found that 70 percent of participants admitted to having deliberately withheld information from a provider at least once, given seven common scenarios — including, for example, being questioned about diet and drug intake. And the most frequently cited reason for withholding was not wanting to be judged by the provider or endure a “lecture.”

Two-way street

But hold the gavel and PowerPoints! That finding says as much about health care providers and their communication as it does about patients’ reasoning.

This becomes increasingly apparent when you consider the next most-frequently cited reasons for withholding information from providers. The majority of them reflect patients’ anxieties or concerns about a provider’s attitude and opinion. They include embarrassment over admitting a behavior to a provider; not wanting to be viewed as a “difficult patient”; concern about taking up a provider’s time; not wanting to hear how “bad” a behavior was or to make corrective changes the provider would likely recommend; and, finally, not wanting a provider “to think that I’m stupid.”

Also high on the list of reasons but addressing a more systemic issue, participants withheld information they didn’t want documented in the medical record.

It’s important to note that the information that had been withheld was clinically relevant. Topping the list of the seven given scenarios, 38 percent of participants had avoided telling providers that they disagreed with their recommendations. Twenty-eight percent decided not to say they hadn’t understood the provider’s instructions.

More than 20 percent deliberately avoided disclosing unhealthy diets, not exercising and not taking prescription medications as instructed. And more than 10 percent chose not to mention a medication they were taking, or they kept silent about taking someone else’s medication.

Communication breakdown

It’s easy to see how these kinds of withholdings could undermine patient care and safety. I can’t count the number of times I’ve seen patients being prescribed one drug after another to manage uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes — all the while, unknown to their providers, they hadn’t been taking the previous ones as prescribed. I’ve seen too many patients get sick from drugs they were secretly taking that were causing side effects or interacting with the drugs they’d been prescribed.

But aside from any specific reason for withholding any particular information, as the prison warden in “Cool Hand Luke” famously declared: “What we’ve got here is failure to communicate.”

That failure speaks volumes about troubled patient-provider relationships, frayed trust in the health care system and the unhealthy lies, secrets and silences that can saturate patient care. And, truth is, that can hurt.

Kate Scannell is a Bay Area physician and the author, most recently, of “Immortal Wounds.”

Categories: News | Health Now
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.