Weight loss prior to bariatric surgery carries risks | TribLIVE.com

Weight loss prior to bariatric surgery carries risks

Weight loss before surgery was associated with readmission for abdominal pain and increases in urinary tract and surgical site infections, researchers found.

Requiring prospective bariatric surgery patients to lose weight before they can undergo the procedure may not be necessary or safe, University of Pennsylvania researchers found in a new study published recently in the journal Obesity Surgery.

The practice of having patients follow a medically supervised weight-loss program before the surgery is rooted in 28-year-old guidelines from the National Institutes of Health, which concluded clinicians should first determine that patients could not succeed with nonsurgical attempts to drop weight. It was later interpreted to require patients to try dieting before the surgery, researchers found.

“There was little data to support the need for the weight loss requirement,” said lead author Colleen Tewksbury, senior research investigator and bariatric program manager with Penn Medicine.

“We wanted to actually measure it,” she said.

The researchers looked at data from about 349,000 patients during 2015 to 2017 who had undergone either a sleeve gastrectomy, in which a large part of the stomach is removed, or a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, which involves creating a small pouch from the stomach and attaching it directly to the small intestine.

There was little evidence to support the conclusion that weight loss before surgery reduced 30-day complications including readmission, corrective surgeries, death or infections, Tewksbury said.

More harm than good

What they found was that patients may actually do more harm by trying to diet first, she said.

Weight loss before surgery was associated with readmission for abdominal pain and increases in urinary tract and surgical site infections, researchers found.

The tradition may also be tied to insurance carriers who require weight loss and counseling before surgical treatment.

“If we don’t adhere to the third-party payer requirement for prior authorization, patients will not get the surgery regardless of whether it is clinically indicated,” Tewksbury said.

But the time spent waiting for patients to achieve a modest weight loss needs to be looked at in the context of putting off the health benefits of having the surgery, Tewksbury said. In addition, faced with the requirement, some patients change their minds about the surgery, she said.

“Obesity as a whole is considered the second leading cause of death,” Tewksbury said. The risk of surgery is less than not seeking treatment, she said.

The American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery has recently come out against the requirement. It stated mandating preoperative weight loss “contributes to patient attrition, causes unnecessary delay of lifesaving treatment, leads to the progression of life-threatening co-morbid conditions, is unethical, and should be abandoned.”

There is almost a systemic bias when it comes to weight, Tewksbury said. Providers do not require the same level of scrutiny or counseling for patients that need a hip or knee replacement, which is an elective procedure to help improve quality of life, she said.

“Overall this is a study that is one step to showing that weight loss before surgery may not be as necessary as we once thought,” she said.

Categories: News | Health Now
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.